Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106244
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: [Python-ideas] Decorators for variables |
| Date | 2016-04-01 11:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.321.1459531585.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <CAEze2WgR7NdR9j01aAB9_hC_hx02nSu7fS2M8ain_P+JjRBcqw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Matthias welp <boekewurm@gmail.com> wrote: >> An example of the transformation would help here > > An example, that detects cycles in a graph, and doesn't do an update if > the graph has cycles. Thanks. > class A(object): > def __init__(self, parent): > @prevent_cycles > self.parent = parent I think you'll find that this doesn't work. Properties are members of the class, not of instances of the class. > This would prevent cycles from being created in this object A, and would > make > some highly reusable code. The same can be done for @not_none, etc, to > prevent > some states which may be unwanted. But you could accomplish the same thing with "self.parent = prevent_cycles(parent)". So I'm still not seeing how the use of the decorator syntax eliminates repetition.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Python-ideas] Decorators for variables Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 11:25 -0600
csiph-web