Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15696
| From | Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Date | 2020-04-30 00:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.319.1588204802.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <85af55bb-1b23-b847-3de9-ffb198bc9fb9@web.de> <20200429074035.GA91269@isc.org> <d08a148f-18f6-1972-1064-2f878b79bee2@nixmagic.com> <20200430000012.GA2952@isc.org> |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:06:20PM +0200, Michael De Roover wrote: > On that subject, how about DoT? I have mixed feelings about using 443 as a > kitchen sink port but encrypting DNS seems like a good idea. Native support by the end of the year, same as DoH. Also, there's a sample configuration for an nginx proxy in the BIND source tree under contrib/dnspriv that you can use now, if you wish. -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> - 2020-04-30 00:00 +0000
csiph-web