Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #40454
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-04 07:12 -0800 |
| References | <c25680d3-6814-4d5f-a5a2-aa4b9bb0c3a0@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2840.1362409142.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing |
| From | Tomas Kotal <tomas.kotal@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2843.1362409932.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
> Under Unix, the return value from os.system() encodes more than one > > piece of information: > > > > http://docs.python.org/2/library/os.html#os.system > > http://docs.python.org/2/library/os.html#os.wait > > > > 32512 is 127*256, meaning that the shell exited with return code 127 > > when given an unrecognized command. > > > > ChrisA Well the point is not the difference between return values of os.system under Windows and Linux. The point is that I set the exist code of child process with os._exit() which works fine on Windows but on Linux the process.exitcode returns always 0. What is very strange is, that if I set return code to some other value, like: ... os._exit( len(cmd) ) ... Then I got exit codes 3 and 2 under Linux, which is correct. But when I do something like this: ... ret = os.system(cmd) print ret # this print real value, like 32512 os._exit(ret) # exitcode of this child process will be 0 on Linux ... It doesn't work, which seems very strange to me.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Different behavior with multiprocessing Tomas Kotal <tomas.kotal@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 06:31 -0800
Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-05 01:58 +1100
Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing Tomas Kotal <tomas.kotal@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 07:12 -0800
Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing Tomas Kotal <tomas.kotal@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 07:12 -0800
Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing Tomas Kotal <tomas.kotal@gmail.com> - 2013-03-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Different behavior with multiprocessing Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-03-05 02:44 +1100
csiph-web