Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46943
| Date | 2013-06-04 13:16 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> |
| Subject | Re: Beginner question |
| References | <CAA=1kxQFcMgSJ2_eD00B35V31WpbFiQ6LR=oBzrigg=8QoafCA@mail.gmail.com> <BLU176-W328C47391F61A540801441D79E0@phx.gbl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2667.1370366201.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/04/2013 07:53 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
> >On 4 Jun 2013 12:28, "Carlos Nepomuceno" <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> wrote:
> [...]
> >> What's going on? Is there a way to make dict() to resolve the
variables?
> >Well yes.
> >dict(**{a:0,b:1})
> >The dict() constructor makes a dictionary from keyword arguments. So
you just have to feed it keyword arguments using **.
> >And if you're in a bad day,
> >dict(**locals())
>
> That's exactly the same!
> >>>dict(**{a:0,b:1})=={a:0,b:1}
> True
>
> Are there any benefits from using dict() instead of {}?
>
Other than what Steven already mentioned, a big advantage is that it's
easier to make a dict if you have a lot of keys that are valid
identifiers, and it's more readable, to boot:
dict(red=1, blue=2, orange=3, violet=4, crimson=5, ...)
VS.
{'red':1, 'blue':2, 'orange':3, 'violet':4, 'crimson':5, ...}
-m
--
Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/
Although the most acute judges of the witches and even the witches
themselves, were convinced of the guilt of witchery, the guilt nevertheless
was non-existent. It is thus with all guilt. Friedrich Nietzsche
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Beginner question eschneider92@comcast.net - 2013-06-03 20:39 -0700
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 09:46 +0300
Re: Beginner question John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-06-04 00:53 -0700
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 11:17 +0300
Re: Beginner question Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2013-06-04 10:45 +0300
Re: Beginner question John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-06-04 00:57 -0700
Re: Beginner question Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 18:24 +1000
Re: Beginner question Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-06-04 11:23 +0200
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 14:23 +0300
Re: Beginner question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-04 12:35 +0000
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 15:51 +0300
Re: Beginner question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-07 02:21 +0000
RE: Beginner question Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 12:34 +0100
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 14:53 +0300
Re: Beginner question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-06-04 12:25 +0000
RE: Beginner question Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-06-04 15:37 +0300
RE: Beginner question Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 13:47 +0100
RE: Beginner question Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 13:15 +0100
Re: Beginner question Mitya Sirenef <msirenef@lightbird.net> - 2013-06-04 13:16 -0400
Re: Beginner question Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-04 02:13 -0700
Re: Beginner question Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-04 09:16 -0400
Re: Beginner question Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-04 20:43 +0100
Re: Beginner question eschneider92@comcast.net - 2013-06-05 20:42 -0700
csiph-web