Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #92277

Re: Python Random vs. Cython C Rand for Dice Rolls

References <55747C96.7090006@cdreimer.com>
Date 2015-06-08 03:23 +1000
Subject Re: Python Random vs. Cython C Rand for Dice Rolls
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.264.1433697806.13271.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:17 AM, C.D. Reimer <chris@cdreimer.com> wrote:
> This is the Python script that takes ~197 seconds to complete.
>
> import random, time
>
> startTime = time.time()
>
> f = [0] * 12
>
> for i in range(50000000):
>
>     a = random.randint(1,6)
>
>     b = random.randint(1,6)
>
>     f[(a + b) - 1] += 1
>
> print "\nTOTAL SPOTS","\tNUMBER OF TIMES\n"
>
> for i in range(1,12):
>
>     print ' ' + str(i + 1), '\t\t ', f[i]
>
> print '\n', time.time() - startTime

Before you go any further, can you just try this script, please, and
see how long it takes to run?

import random, time
startTime = time.time()
for i in range(50000000):
    pass
print '\n', time.time() - startTime

I know, seems a stupid thing to try, right? But you're using Python 2,
as evidenced by the print statements, and that means that range() is
constructing a 50M element list. It's entirely possible that that's a
significant part of your time - allocating all that memory, populating
it, and then disposing of it at the end (maybe).

Maybe it'll turn out not to be significant, but there's only one way
to find out.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Python Random vs. Cython C Rand for Dice Rolls Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-08 03:23 +1000
  Re: Python Random vs. Cython C Rand for Dice Rolls Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-06-07 21:34 +0200

csiph-web