Re: Sandboxing Python

References	<mrb0eh$2md$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrD3oBaHW64BNV6g9RM8LP7khdYUaXDjMXLeSb7dDe7Dg@mail.gmail.com> <mrb20m$l4d$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.22.1440288298.17298.python-list@python.org> <mrbku6$6me$1@dont-email.me>
Date	2015-08-23 15:41 +1000
Subject	Re: Sandboxing Python
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.26.1440308516.17298.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote:
> Would it be that difficult to get the same for Python? On the C side, the
> interpreter is a structure and does not use global variables (as opposed to
> CPython), therefore it is easy to create more than one interpreter in a
> single program, and also to reflect that to the scripting level.

There have been some explorations in that direction. However, it would
be very difficult to pass objects from one interpreter to the other,
so you'd be restricted to some form of serialization... at which point
you may as well just use a subprocess, which you can isolate using OS
facilities.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Sandboxing Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 10:04 +1000
  Re: Sandboxing Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2015-08-23 07:17 +0200
    Re: Sandboxing Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 15:41 +1000

csiph-web