Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43014
| Date | 2013-04-07 20:23 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> |
| Subject | Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question |
| References | <f0759987-4ff8-49a1-a826-4ae3f6508030@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <alg3m81dohei58jefi5nmaumcdcvkma2pu@invalid.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.252.1365362646.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 07/04/13 20:09, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 04:16:27 -0700 (PDT), ReviewBoard User > <lalitha.viswanath@gmail.com> declaimed the following in > gmane.comp.python.general: > >> Hi >> I am a newbie to python and am trying to write a program that does a >> sum of squares of numbers whose squares are odd. >> For example, for x from 1 to 100, it generates 165 as an output (sum >> of 1,9,25,49,81) >> >> Here is the code I have >> print reduce(lambda x, y: x+y, filter(lambda x: x%2, map(lambda x: >> x*x, xrange >> (10**6)))) = sum(x*x for x in xrange(1, 10**6, 2)) >> >> I am getting a syntax error. >> Can you let me know what the error is? >> > I can't even read that mess... three nested lambda? > > Not the most efficient version but... > >>>> sum( x*x for x in range(100/2) if (x*x % 2) and (x*x < 100) ) > 165 >> > > The range(100/2) is a simple reduction to avoid invoking a sqrt > function... the more economical is > >>>> import math >>>> sum( x*x for x in range(int(math.sqrt(100))) if x*x % 2) > 165 >>>> I'm surprised no one has suggested: >>> import math >>> sum( x*x for x in range(1, int(math.sqrt(100)), 2)) Regards, Ian F
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Newbie to python. Very newbie question ReviewBoard User <lalitha.viswanath@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 04:16 -0700
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Kruno Saho <kruno.saho@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 04:19 -0700
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-07 07:50 -0400
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 10:02 -0700
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 10:04 -0700
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-04-07 15:09 -0400
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 16:57 -0700
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-04-07 20:23 +0100
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 21:16 +0100
Re: Newbie to python. Very newbie question Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-08 03:16 +0000
csiph-web