Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #46516
| References | <CAGVx7UWXAFHSHq37Ep-Vk=cM2wYrEGHSUhNc8s43bCvj_VcVow@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.2374.1369852683.3114.python-list@python.org> <51a6ef42$0$11118$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2397.1369904083.3114.python-list@python.org> <503a1a1e-9c5c-4c01-929b-673421907ab8@ys5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-31 03:28 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2434.1369934893.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:12 AM, rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote:
> You associate the primal (f)act of thinking about programming with
> *doing* the generating.
> By contrast the functional programmer thinks about what *is* the
> result.
I wish you'd explain that to my boss :) He often has trouble
understanding why sometimes I put two syntactic statements on one
line, such as:
for (int i=0;i<nfoo;++i) if (foo[i].marker)
{
//do something with foo[i]
}
In Python, that would probably be done with a list comprehension or
some other form of filtered iteration, and is to my mind a single
operation - "iterate over all the marked foo" is just as much a valid
loop header as "iterate over all the foo". This is a simple example,
and what you say about thinking about what *is* the result doesn't
really translate well into a C++ example, but the broader concept
applies: there's a difference between code as the compiler/interpreter
sees it and code as the programmer sees it, and there is not always a
1:1 correspondence of statements.
ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 02:37 +0800
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 06:18 +0000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 16:54 +0800
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 10:12 -0700
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 03:28 +1000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 10:59 -0700
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 04:22 +1000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 01:46 +0800
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 03:50 +1000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com> - 2013-05-31 01:50 +0800
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-30 19:36 +0000
Re: How clean/elegant is Python's syntax? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-05-30 17:30 -0600
csiph-web