Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6554
| References | (1 earlier) <mailman.2207.1306628936.9059.python-list@python.org> <irsarj$2b9$1@reader1.panix.com> <mailman.2215.1306657864.9059.python-list@python.org> <irtlu8$qk3$1@reader1.panix.com> <4DE285E8.4080801@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-30 03:50 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: float("nan") in set or as key |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2228.1306691418.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:44 AM, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > Would there be any advantage to making NaN a singleton? I'm thinking > that it could make checking for it cheaper in the implementation of > sets and dicts. Or making NaN unhashable? Doesn't matter. It still wouldn't be equal to itself, even though it 'is' itself, which will greatly confuse anything that optimizes that away. Numbers are well-behaved; NaN is not a number; NaN is not well-behaved. It makes sense... in a way. Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Albert Hopkins <marduk@letterboxes.org> - 2011-05-28 20:28 -0400
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Erik Max Francis <max@alcyone.com> - 2011-05-28 17:44 -0700
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-29 02:25 +0000
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Wolfgang Rohdewald <wolfgang@rohdewald.de> - 2011-05-29 10:27 +0200
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-29 14:41 +0000
Re: float("nan") in set or as key MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-29 18:44 +0100
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-29 18:27 +0000
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 03:50 +1000
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-05-29 20:05 +0200
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-29 18:46 +0000
Re: float("nan") in set or as key Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-05-29 20:36 -0700
csiph-web