Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45848
| From | Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator |
| Date | 2013-05-24 01:20 +0300 |
| References | <knltkb$6b1$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2039.1369347695.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
---------------------------------------- > To: python-list@python.org > From: tjreedy@udel.edu [...] >> It's a conflict in the design. A tuple is used to supply multiple >> arguments to the % operator. So if you want to have a tuple as the >> first argument, you need to enclose it in another tuple. > > The problem is that interpolating 1 to many items into a string is *not* > a binary operation. The needed hack to pretend that it is, using a tuple > to represent multiple items rather than just itself, was one of the > reasons for making string formatting a honest function, where multiple > items to be formatted are passed as multiple arguments. Thanks so much guys! Now I understand why some people hate %-formatting! I don't think that's a problem because there's no format specifier for tuples in the %-formatting definition[1]. So it's up to the user to make the necessary conversion. I still love the %-formatting style! Can str.format() do the following? f = '%d %d %d' v = '1,2,3' print f % eval(v) If yes, how? [1] http://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 14:53 -0500
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-22 02:59 +0000
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2013-05-21 22:38 -0500
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2013-05-22 05:45 -0500
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-05-22 14:58 +0000
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-05-22 14:30 -0400
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2013-05-22 13:26 -0700
RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 01:31 +0300
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2013-05-23 06:44 -0700
RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 18:26 +0300
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-05-23 14:42 -0400
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator nn <pruebauno@latinmail.com> - 2013-05-24 06:50 -0700
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-05-23 16:19 -0400
RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-24 01:20 +0300
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 21:17 -0400
RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-24 04:41 +0300
Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-05-23 01:30 +0100
RE: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator Carlos Nepomuceno <carlosnepomuceno@outlook.com> - 2013-05-23 03:44 +0300
csiph-web