Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #6094

Re: Is there a better way to solve this?

References <mailman.1906.1306046523.9059.python-list@python.org> <a6f25b6b-ddfe-435a-9035-5f156888d2b5@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
Date 2011-05-23 16:27 -0400
Subject Re: Is there a better way to solve this?
From David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1986.1306182479.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:55 PM, kracekumar ramaraju
<kracethekingmaker@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can use sizeof function,
>>>> a=12234
>>>> b=23456.8
>>>> a.__sizeof__()
> 12
>>>> b.__sizeof__()
> 16
> So sizeof int is 12 bytes and float is 16 bytes

I'm not sure what you're trying to show here, but try the following in
Python 3.2

>>> a = 9999
>>> for i in range(5):
...      a*= 100000
...      a.__sizeof__()
...

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is there a better way to solve this? kracekumar ramaraju <kracethekingmaker@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 11:55 -0700
  Re: Is there a better way to solve this? David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 16:27 -0400
  Re: Is there a better way to solve this? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-23 18:06 -0400

csiph-web