Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30964
| References | <91ff9b33-c212-4be0-8ed0-1f6b16f56865@googlegroups.com> <5072E7CC.2070405@davea.name> <CAPTjJmons5fwExNOaug0dNsym2eLe5Pduh6cVqynSAPoSowQdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5072EDA6.6040202@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-09 02:19 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1955.1349709547.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Dave Angel <d@davea.name> wrote: > On 10/08/2012 11:00 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Dave Angel <d@davea.name> wrote: >>> The Decimal class has the disadvantage that it's tons slower on any modern machine I know of... >> Isn't it true, though, that Python 3.3 has a completely new >> implementation of decimal that largely removes this disadvantage? >> >> ChrisA > > I wouldn't know, I'm on 3.2. However, I sincerely doubt if it's within > a factor of 100 of the speed of the binary float, at least on > pentium-class machines that do binary float in microcode. A dozen years > or so ago, when the IEEE floating point standard was still being formed, > I tried to argue the committee into including decimal in the standard > (which they did much later). Had it been in the standard then, we MIGHT > have had decimal fp on chip as well as binary. Then again, the standard > was roughly based on the already-existing Intel 8087, so maybe it was > just hopeless. > > I guess it's possible that for some operations, the cost of the > byte-code interpreter and function lookup, etc. might reduce the > apparent penalty. Has anybody done any timings? Try this, from python-dev list: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-September/121832.html It's not as fast as float, but it sure gives a good account for itself. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? iMath <redstone-cold@163.com> - 2012-10-08 07:07 -0700
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 10:48 -0400
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 02:00 +1100
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm � Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-09 11:39 +0000
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 11:13 -0400
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-10-08 16:44 +0200
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 02:19 +1100
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-10-08 21:45 -0400
Re: To get the accurate value of 1 - 0.999999999999999 ,how to implement the python algorithm ? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-10-08 22:20 -0400
csiph-web