Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5976

Re: TK program problem

References <9f91909a-ce08-47dd-81d3-e7cf2edad3b6@h12g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <ir7shb$dd8$1@solani.org> <fe3b6da7-4e9a-4226-bc6e-a271714c2df8@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <5a309bd1-71e1-4c78-a304-24552b1c5da5@m40g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
Date 2011-05-23 00:25 +1000
Subject Re: TK program problem
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1915.1306074309.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:03 AM, rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... was about as effective as the "orb of confusion" on Patrick...
> *drool*
>

That sounds like a Dungeons and Dragons artifact item... invoking the
orb of confusion is a standard action that does not provoke an Attack
of Opportunity.

> class MyDialog(blah):
>   blah,blah,blah
>
> def show_dialog(*args):
>    d = MyDialog(*args)
>    return d.result
>
> result = show_dialog()

I don't really see why it shouldn't be valid to use the class itself
in this way. Once the constructor returns, the object IS the return
value.

But then, my opinion may not be valid. I've done weird things in C++
where, for instance, the invocation of a modeless dialog is:

new FoobarDialog(params);

And somewhere it has an event (eg when the window is destroyed) that executes:

delete this;

I'm a little mad and generally silly, so my opinion doesn't matter
(matter matter matter matter). But it did work, and the code was nice
and clean!

Chris Angelico

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-20 11:03 -0700
  Re: TK program problem Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 13:20 -0600
    Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-20 15:12 -0700
      Re: TK program problem Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:33 -0600
        Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-20 16:07 -0700
          Re: TK program problem Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 17:29 -0600
            Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-20 16:34 -0700
          Re: TK program problem rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:37 -0700
            Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-21 17:07 -0700
  Re: TK program problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-21 10:18 +0200
    Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-21 17:03 -0700
      Re: TK program problem Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-21 20:33 -0400
        Re: TK program problem bvdp <bob@mellowood.ca> - 2011-05-21 19:20 -0700
          Re: TK program problem Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-22 17:17 -0400
      Re: TK program problem rantingrick <rantingrick@gmail.com> - 2011-05-22 07:03 -0700
        Re: TK program problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 00:25 +1000

csiph-web