Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #38982
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: multiple 2.7.3 versions? |
| Date | 2013-02-15 19:46 -0500 |
| References | <511E13A2.8010600@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <kfmdu8$iim$1@ger.gmane.org> <nad-8B6CF2.15062415022013@news.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1865.1360975620.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2/15/2013 6:06 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > In article <kfmdu8$iim$1@ger.gmane.org>, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> > wrote: >> On 2/15/2013 5:53 AM, Robin Becker wrote: >>> On >>> all the other machines I have access to I'm seeing something similar to >>> this >> >>>> Python 2.7.3 (default, Apr 10 2012, 23:31:26) [MSC v.1500 32 bit >>>> (Intel)] on win32 >> >> Notice the date again -- the original release date of 2.7.3. > > FYI - the date is a build date; it doesn't tell you much about the > source code base used for that Python build. If a build called 2.7.3 is built on the 2.7.3 release date, one may reasonably think that it is built from the 2.7.3 code released on that date. Besides which, I recognized that as the header from the PSF distributed build ;-). More problematical is any build, even of the same name, built later, by anyone else, as with Ubuntu releases. > But if it had the hg rev used > for the checkout, you have some indication of what it contains. My impression is that Ubuntu does not build from any of *our* hg revs, but that they cherry pick patches to apply in their repository. I agree that is they gave *their* repository url and checkout id, that would be helpful. We could possible do that with our releases too. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: multiple 2.7.3 versions? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-02-15 19:46 -0500
csiph-web