Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101177
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Trailing zeros of 100! |
| Date | 2016-01-03 11:20 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.186.1451780463.11925.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <n68s1t$ke9$1@news.albasani.net> <mailman.172.1451753180.11925.python-list@python.org> <n68vgc$qi6$1@news.albasani.net> <mailman.184.1451771860.11925.python-list@python.org> <n69oev$uv8$1@news.albasani.net> |
Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> writes: > Am 02.01.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Chris Angelico: > >>> But did you actually test it? > >> > >> Yes, should work for n >= 1. By “test it”, Chris of course means test it *by implementing it in a program and running that program in Python*. > >> Why do you ask? > > > > Your "should work" does not sound good as a response to "actually > > test". Normally I would expect the response to be "Yes, and it > > worked for me" (maybe with a log of an interactive session). > > Well, honestly, I trusted my math and didn't thought much about the > technical limitations. That's why it's good to actually test the hypothesis in a real computer program, run on the actual computer system you're going to use. Computers are physical systems, with technical compromises to the physical constraints under which they were built. They are not perfect implementations of our ideal mathematics, and testing the mathematics is no guarantee the mathematical assumptions will survive your program unscathed. So, a request “Did you actually test it?” is both a polite reminder to do that, and an attempt to get you to do so if you didn't. If you didn't, then answering “yes” is wasting everyone's time. -- \ “As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, | `\ the Internet deserves the highest protection from governmental | _o__) intrusion.” —U.S. District Court Judge Dalzell | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Trailing zeros of 100! katye2007@gmail.com - 2016-01-02 03:49 -0800
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 23:19 +1100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! katye2007@gmail.com - 2016-01-02 04:34 -0800
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 13:44 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! "yehudak ." <katye2007@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 15:14 +0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2016-01-02 16:57 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org> - 2016-01-02 17:09 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2016-01-02 17:56 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Bernardo Sulzbach <mafagafogigante@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 15:24 -0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:57 +1100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2016-01-03 01:02 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 11:20 +1100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 07:16 +0530
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Tony van der Hoff <tony@vanderhoff.org> - 2016-01-03 11:53 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 09:57 -0500
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 16:24 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 15:30 +0000
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2016-01-02 16:54 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-01-02 18:18 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2016-01-02 10:33 -0600
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! "yehudak ." <katye2007@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:34 +0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 17:44 +0000
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-03 00:36 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 20:28 +0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 19:29 +0100
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! "yehudak ." <katye2007@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:02 +0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! "yehudak ." <katye2007@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:09 +0200
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 21:25 +0000
Re: Trailing zeros of 100! Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-02 21:26 +0000
csiph-web