Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10795
| Date | 2011-08-03 11:47 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> |
| Subject | Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files |
| References | <3d2c3d3b-085e-4f3b-903d-726a31e607f4@b34g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4E37CDCF.7060501@jollybox.de> <CAGGBd_qm3_wamKNv2LW5giYKmMpyHFoo=Y-8kXZZLmxPPk3G3A@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1828.1312364840.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 03/08/11 03:59, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de > <mailto:t@jollybox.de>> wrote: > > On 02/08/11 11:32, loial wrote: > > I am trying to hardlink all files in a directory structure using > > os.link. > > > > However I do not think it is possible to hard link directories ? > > > That is pretty true. I've heard of hardlinked directories on Solaris, > but that's kind of an exception to the general rule. > > > > So presumably I would need to do a mkdir for each sub-directory > > encountered? > > Or is there an easier way to hardlink everything in a directory > > structure?. > > > > The requirement is for hard links, not symbolic links > > > > Yes, you have to mkdir everything. However, there is an easier way: > > subprocess.Popen(['cp','-Rl','target','link']) > > This is assuming that you're only supporting Unices with a working cp > program, but as you're using hard links, that's quite a safe bet, I > should think. > > > A little more portable way: > > $ cd from; find . -print | cpio -pdlv ../to > cpio: ./b linked to ../to/./b > ../to/./b > cpio: ./a linked to ../to/./a > ../to/./a > cpio: ./c linked to ../to/./c > ../to/./c > ../to/./d > cpio: ./d/1 linked to ../to/./d/1 > ../to/./d/1 > cpio: ./d/2 linked to ../to/./d/2 > ../to/./d/2 > cpio: ./d/3 linked to ../to/./d/3 > ../to/./d/3 > 0 blocks > > However, you could do it without a shell command (IOW in pure python) > using os.path.walk(). Is it more portable? I don't actually have cpio installed on this system. Which implementations of cp don't implement -R and -l? Of course, the best way is probably implementing this in Python, either with os.path.walk, or with a monkey-patched shutil.copytree, as Peter suggested. Thomas
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hardlink sub-directories and files loial <jldunn2000@gmail.com> - 2011-08-02 02:32 -0700
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-08-02 12:01 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-08-02 12:13 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-02 06:17 -0500
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-08-02 21:46 -0700
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2011-08-03 12:02 +0530
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-08-03 14:22 +0000
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-08-03 17:08 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2011-08-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-03 08:04 +0100
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-08-03 11:47 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-08-03 20:49 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-08-03 23:54 +0200
Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files Alexander Gattin <xrgtn@yandex.ru> - 2011-08-08 10:07 +0300
csiph-web