Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5818
| References | (1 earlier) <9d9c163b-14fd-4131-81bb-105c3b97c432@h36g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <mailman.1680.1305651743.9059.python-list@python.org> <4dd59e1e$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1806.1305848281.9059.python-list@python.org> <4dd602ec$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-20 16:06 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1823.1305871603.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > ... until you deleted most of it :) Minimalist quoting practice! :) > If you want an *accurate* fib() function using exponentiation of φ, you > need arbitrary precision non-integers. I believe the 'bc' command-line calculator can do a-p non-i, and I know REXX can, but it seems to be quite an unusual thing. Is it that much harder than a-p integer that it's just not worthwhile? It seems strange to smoothly slide from native integer to long integer and just keep on going, and yet to be unable to do the same if there's a fractional part on it. Chris Angelico
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers RJB <rbotting@csusb.edu> - 2011-05-17 08:50 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:23 -0600
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:25 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 09:36 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 10:02 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-05-17 20:19 +0300
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 11:56 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Wolfram Hinderer <wolfram.hinderer@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-17 14:04 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 14:59 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-05-17 21:43 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-19 22:47 +0000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 09:37 +1000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 05:58 +0000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:06 +1000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-20 01:26 -0500
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 16:54 +1000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 17:07 +0000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:43 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 10:44 +1000
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-21 20:49 +1200
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 01:26 -0600
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 01:32 -0600
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers SigmundV <sigmundv@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 03:53 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 17:03 -0700
Re: Faster Recursive Fibonacci Numbers Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-24 16:44 -0700
csiph-web