Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5788
| Date | 2011-05-19 15:40 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: os.access giving incorrect results on Windows |
| References | <21581D39FA3BDF40904D75AF9653CE2606567E4A@blrex.prog.altair.com> <4DD572FB.2010809@timgolden.me.uk> <4DD575E1.9060801@gmail.com> <4DD578AF.3000001@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1802.1305837633.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2011.05.19 03:08 PM, Tim Golden wrote: > * A R_OK check always succeeds if the file's attributes can be read > at all So is this the same as F_OK then, or does it return false if the user isn't allowed to read permissions? > * A W_OK check fails if the file has its DOS read-only attribute set DOS attribute? > * A W_OK check always succeeds for a directory (because read-only means > something else for directories). > > Would you care to propose some wording for the docs? I'm quite happy > to commit if we can come to an agreement. I'm a beginner when it comes to Python, but I could give it a shot. A big red warning box explaining how the code under Windows doesn't use ACLs under the os.access() entry (above the notes) seems appropriate. A warning box under os.W_OK saying something like "Under Windows, access() will always indicate that a directory is writable." would also fit. You know more about this than I do. I'm running Windows 7 right now and I have a Python 3.2 interpreter window open if you want me to test/confirm something. :-)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: os.access giving incorrect results on Windows Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 15:40 -0500
csiph-web