Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5788

Re: os.access giving incorrect results on Windows

Date 2011-05-19 15:40 -0500
From Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
Subject Re: os.access giving incorrect results on Windows
References <21581D39FA3BDF40904D75AF9653CE2606567E4A@blrex.prog.altair.com> <4DD572FB.2010809@timgolden.me.uk> <4DD575E1.9060801@gmail.com> <4DD578AF.3000001@timgolden.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1802.1305837633.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2011.05.19 03:08 PM, Tim Golden wrote:
> * A R_OK check always succeeds if the file's attributes can be read
>    at all
So is this the same as F_OK then, or does it return false if the user
isn't allowed to read permissions?
> * A W_OK check fails if the file has its DOS read-only attribute set
DOS attribute?
> * A W_OK check always succeeds for a directory (because read-only means
>    something else for directories).
>
> Would you care to propose some wording for the docs? I'm quite happy
> to commit if we can come to an agreement.
I'm a beginner when it comes to Python, but I could give it a shot. A
big red warning box explaining how the code under Windows doesn't use
ACLs under the os.access() entry (above the notes) seems appropriate. A
warning box under os.W_OK saying something like "Under Windows, access()
will always indicate that a directory is writable." would also fit. You
know more about this than I do. I'm running Windows 7 right now and I
have a Python 3.2 interpreter window open if you want me to test/confirm
something. :-)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: os.access giving incorrect results on Windows Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 15:40 -0500

csiph-web