Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #83399

Re: Decimals and other numbers

From Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Subject Re: Decimals and other numbers
Date 2015-01-09 14:03 +1100
References <CABicbJK-5izGtet8BsS1Yqx+6AHMX7gLU4zYjjt5jULJXNVipA@mail.gmail.com> <54AF405C.6020609@davea.name>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.17502.1420772948.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> writes:

> What you don't say is which behavior you actually expected.  Since
> 0**0 is undefined mathematically, I'd expect either an exception or a
> NAN result.

Do you think that the ‘int’ and ‘float’ types, which do produce a number
result for ‘0 ** 0’, are buggy and should be fixed?

I think the inconsistency is unnecessarily confusing. Perhaps the
consistency is in standards outside Python, but I think there is cause
here either for a change of behaviour or, if ther eis a good rationale
for the incompatible behaviours, to document the rationale. In either
case, a bug report is warranted IMO.

-- 
 \     “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that |
  `\      divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of |
_o__)            being correct.” —Niels Bohr (to Wolfgang Pauli), 1958 |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Decimals and other numbers Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-01-09 14:03 +1100

csiph-web