Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #83399
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Decimals and other numbers |
| Date | 2015-01-09 14:03 +1100 |
| References | <CABicbJK-5izGtet8BsS1Yqx+6AHMX7gLU4zYjjt5jULJXNVipA@mail.gmail.com> <54AF405C.6020609@davea.name> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.17502.1420772948.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> writes: > What you don't say is which behavior you actually expected. Since > 0**0 is undefined mathematically, I'd expect either an exception or a > NAN result. Do you think that the ‘int’ and ‘float’ types, which do produce a number result for ‘0 ** 0’, are buggy and should be fixed? I think the inconsistency is unnecessarily confusing. Perhaps the consistency is in standards outside Python, but I think there is cause here either for a change of behaviour or, if ther eis a good rationale for the incompatible behaviours, to document the rationale. In either case, a bug report is warranted IMO. -- \ “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that | `\ divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of | _o__) being correct.” —Niels Bohr (to Wolfgang Pauli), 1958 | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Decimals and other numbers Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-01-09 14:03 +1100
csiph-web