Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #2534
| References | (14 earlier) <mailman.113.1301707325.2990.python-list@python.org> <4d97020f$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <AANLkTimVah3o+B3AV+UtrBptd0horvCTZRAjCax-Cpwp@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.156.1301812482.2990.python-list@python.org> <4d984a21$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-03 12:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method |
| From | geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.173.1301860688.2990.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:34:34 +1000, Brian Quinlan wrote: > >> On 3 Apr 2011, at 16:22, geremy condra wrote: >>> I think we're talking at cross purposes. The point I'm making is that >>> there are lots of issues where popularity as a third party module isn't >>> really a viable test for whether a feature is sufficiently awesome to >>> be in core python. As part of determining whether I thought it was >>> appropriate in this case I essentially just asked myself whether any of >>> the really good and necessary parts of Python would fail to be >>> readmitted under similar circumstances, and I think the answer is that >>> very few would come back in. To me, that indicates that this isn't the >>> right way to address this issue, although I admit that I lack any solid >>> proof to base that conclusion on. >> >> This has been discussed a few times on python-dev. I think that most >> developers acknowledge that small-but-high-utility modules would not >> survive outside of the core because people would simple recreate them >> rather than investing the time to find, learn and use them. > > That's certainly true for pure Python code, but for a C extension, the > barrier to Do It Yourself will be much higher for most Python coders. I don't think people will work around it in C. I think they'll grudgingly accept a slow and kludgy python workaround, and more to the point I think they would do that with a vast majority of features at this scale. That's why I say this isn't a good test here- because you could apply it to a great feature or a terrible feature and with overwhelming probability have them fail in both cases. > On the other hand, for a pure Python function or class, you could stick > it on ActiveState's Python cookbook and get some imperfect measure of > popularity and/or usefulness from the comments and votes there. Frankly, I have little trust in this as a measure of popularity. Even PyPI isn't a great indicator, and the numbers you get off of ActiveState are almost certain to be way, way noisier. Geremy Condra
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Antoon Pardon <Antoon.Pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2011-03-30 11:06 +0200
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-03-31 02:13 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Antoon Pardon <Antoon.Pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2011-03-31 11:41 +0200
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-03-31 04:59 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 14:31 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 00:41 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-01 18:22 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 23:22 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Brian Quinlan <brian@sweetapp.com> - 2011-04-03 16:34 +1000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-03 10:21 +0000
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-04-03 12:58 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-01 19:29 -0700
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-02 13:43 +1100
Re: Guido rethinking removal of cmp from sort method Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-02 11:27 +0000
csiph-web