Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum.

References	(1 earlier) <519172C3.4030108@stoneleaf.us> <CAA=1kxSHKjoTYZZ7Gs_Tpo+h3hRVQRb0p8aeEnnKuXf9jWA4cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpK2yRbDxy5SZQXvRi3dH0UGSmihNU4NJcpu_DY7A=+1g@mail.gmail.com> <kmtjvu$kb9$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmoHYi3QPo5gO+NDiNJ7VMc57epGkoOYgOAvnN14bRE8FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2013-05-14 18:09 +0100
Subject	Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum.
From	Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1675.1368552903.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

I corrected it indeed.

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
>> On 5/14/2013 3:52 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> http://fabiosantoscode.blogspot.pt/2013/05/pythons-new-enum-class.html
>>>
>>>
>>>      class Text(unicode, Enum):
>>>          one = u'one'
>>>          two = u'two'
>>>          three = u'three'
>>
>>
>> Is this supposed to be a quote? or your rewrite? or did Santos rewrite after
>> you posted? The blog currently has a 3.x version of that.
>
> It was a quote from the blog post as it had been when I posted it.
> Presumably he edited the post subsequently, as I'm now seeing the same
> thing you are, a 3.x-compat version. (The u'xx' prefixes wouldn't be a
> problem, incidentally, so this could be dual-versionned just by going
> "unicode = str".)
>
> ChrisA
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list



-- 
Fábio Santos

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Writing a blog post on the new Enum. Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 18:09 +0100

csiph-web