Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5571
| References | <BANLkTimFOXHqkHzD=ZRoE3yH+6ru0bvNng@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-17 08:49 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: portable multiprocessing code |
| From | Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1675.1305647357.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Eric Frederich <eric.frederich@gmail.com> wrote: > I have written some code using Python 2.7 but I'd like these scripts > to be able to run on Red Hat 5's 2.4.3 version of Python which doesn't > have multiprocessing. > I can try to import multiprocessing and set a flag as to whether it is > available. Then I can create a Queue.Queue instead of a > multiprocessing.Queue for the arg_queue and result_queue. > Without actually trying this yet it seems like things would work okay > except for the Worker class. It seems I can conditionally replace > multiprocessing.Queue with Queue.Queue, but is there anything to > replace multiprocessing.Process with? > > Are there any best practices for doing something like this? > Below is a dumb example that just counts lines in files. > What would be the best way to make this runnable in older (2.4.3) > versions of Python? > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/multiprocessing Also, you may be able to find the processing package (what multiprocessing was called back when it was 3rd party) in your package manager.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: portable multiprocessing code Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-05-17 08:49 -0700
csiph-web