Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #102530
| From | "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation |
| Date | 2016-02-05 17:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15.1454690143.19407.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.72.1454619005.30993.python-list@python.org> <56b3e902$0$1613$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CACs7g=C-MEHLWYZWJPiiJfxoFHE3y3UcEL2Q7kE=HLNbGQkV+g@mail.gmail.com> <56B4CD7B.70506@mail.de> |
again for the list:
###################
import random
from xheap import RemovalHeap
class X(object):
c = 0
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __lt__(self, other):
X.c += 1
return self.x < other.x
n = 100000
for jj in range(5):
items = [X(i) for i in range(n)]
random.shuffle(items)
heap = RemovalHeap(items)
random.shuffle(items)
for i in items:
heap.remove(i)
print(X.c)
X.c = 0
(note to myself: never copy PyCharm formatting strings to this list).
On 05.02.2016 17:27, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> Hi srinivas,
>
> I wrote this simple benchmark to measure comparisons:
>
> import random
>
> from xheapimport RemovalHeap
>
>
> class X(object):
> c =0 def __init__(self, x):
> self.x = x
> def __lt__(self, other):
> X.c +=1 return self.x < other.x
>
> n =100000 for jjin range(5):
> items = [X(i)for iin range(n)]
> random.shuffle(items)
> heap = RemovalHeap(items)
>
> random.shuffle(items)
> for i in items:
> heap.remove(i)
>
> print(X.c)
> X.c =0
>
>
> old version:
> 430457
> 430810
> 430657
> 429971
> 430583
>
> your pull request version:
> 426414
> 426045
> 425437
> 425528
> 425522
>
>
> Can we do better here?
>
> Best,
> Sven
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
_siftup and _siftdown implementation srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 02:20 +0530
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-02-05 11:12 +1100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-05 01:21 +0100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:56 +0530
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-05 15:42 +0100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation Bernardo Sulzbach <mafagafogigante@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 12:48 -0200
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-05 15:55 +0100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation Bernardo Sulzbach <mafagafogigante@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 12:59 -0200
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 21:15 +0530
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-05 17:27 +0100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-02-05 17:35 +0100
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:12 +0530
Re: _siftup and _siftdown implementation srinivas devaki <mr.eightnoteight@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 20:16 +0530
csiph-web