Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10161
| Date | 2011-07-23 02:30 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> |
| Subject | Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils |
| References | <562586f4-d1cd-4bce-af50-fefdbb2ef0f9@h7g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <mailman.1365.1311344946.1164.python-list@python.org> <acf9108a-3b97-40e5-92ee-3c59345d6ea6@d8g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <mailman.1380.1311360188.1164.python-list@python.org> <e6fb9db1-0671-45cb-aa82-00cc1999aa5b@f17g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1396.1311381051.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 22/07/11 21:37, strattonbrazil wrote: >> Okay, your terminology was confused: you want to extend Python, not your >> application. > > Sorry, after I sent that e-mail, I realized I had already mixed up the > terms, where I should have written "embedding". > >> First of all, you don't technically need distutils: an extension module >> is simply a shared library that you can build like any other library, >> and I'm sure your build system can easily handle that. Then, you can >> probably use bits of distutils to figure out where to install things to. > > Hrmm, this seems like the most practical solution for me right now. > It makes sense to embed python in my application like I originally > planned, where I expose the individual functions I want to expose. > Eventually if I actually want to provide the exposed functions as a > library, I could actually just compile the application to a shared > library instead of an executable (just not using the main function). > The bindings in the C++ code are the same, correct? Only the way > they're built seems different. There's no difference between using C and C++. Obviously, you always need the correct extern "C" declarations, but IIRC, Python's method definition macros handle that. You could convert your whole application to a Python extension module, expose the main function to Python, and launch the program using a small Python wrapper script. (Or you could embed Python in your application.) > >> Lastly, depending on what your goals are, you might want to consider not >> integrating Python with your application at all, but exposing what >> functionality you want to expose to Python via dbus. You could write a >> skeleton module that exposes dbus proxy objects to Python scripts / >> modules to make life easier.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
compiling qt app extensions with distutils strattonbrazil <strattonbrazil@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 06:43 -0700
Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-22 16:29 +0200
Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils strattonbrazil <strattonbrazil@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 09:22 -0700
Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-22 20:43 +0200
Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils strattonbrazil <strattonbrazil@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 12:37 -0700
Re: compiling qt app extensions with distutils Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2011-07-23 02:30 +0200
csiph-web