Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > gnu.bash.bug > #11947
| From | Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.bash.bug |
| Subject | Re: Installation of PDF/PS/DVI and HTML files |
| Date | 2015-12-04 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1394.1449252654.31583.bug-bash@gnu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87lh9bu6w2.fsf@gnu.org> <20151203151351.GT27325@eeg.ccf.org> <87io4etw74.fsf@gnu.org> <5661BF37.1030107@tlinx.org> |
Hi, Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> writes: > Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> writes: >>> The de facto standard for "make" followed "make install" on a >>> _Unix_-like system is to install man pages. >> >> For more _GNU_ standards ....[_emphasis_ mine] > --- > Notice you are comparing 'GNU' (new) standards compared to > older and established standards. Many of the newer standards fly in > the face of good design and throw-out previous 'best-practices' standards > for no other reason than to follow new standards that are not justifiable > based on user-utility nor sound computer science. The GNU standards were mentioned only because Bash is a GNU package. I wasn't implying that they are higher standards or anything like that. I was just reminding that within the GNU project, an info manual is mandatory and man pages are only optional (not the other way). -- Mathieu Lirzin
Back to gnu.bash.bug | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Installation of PDF/PS/DVI and HTML files Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> - 2015-12-04 19:10 +0100
csiph-web