Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76822
| References | (1 earlier) <CAPTjJmrO7fER7Wjgo6qNO9qHNJgkJ7Y3BFWBf1L=t-bOv4JV7w@mail.gmail.com> <53F634E5.4020206@m4x.org> <mailman.13263.1408667169.18130.python-list@python.org> <0f0ef37d-7d09-483f-8f9b-c63c444f1ea7@googlegroups.com> <3DBE5DB0-3FA8-43BB-947C-9F6C265D0699@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-23 06:32 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Halfway point between interactive and daemon? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13308.1408739570.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m curious if there’s a technique one could use to get half way there. Basically, with minimal modifications, I’d like to get it running at startup. Okay, hold on a minute there. There are two quite separate things here: daemonization, and starting on system startup. Daemonization is actually unnecessary to the latter, if you use a modern init system. Just write your program to never fork, and either Upstart or systemd will happily monitor it. Just create a unit file, something like this: [Unit] Description=Yosemite Project [Service] Environment=DISPLAY=:0.0 User=whichever_user_to_run_as ExecStart=/usr/bin/python /path/to/your/script # If the network isn't available yet, restart until it is. Restart=on-failure RestartSec=10 [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target $ systemctl --system daemon-reload $ systemctl enable yos.service $ systemctl start yos.service (Feel free to steal that for your own purposes. It came from my MIT-licensed videos server project "Yosemite".) Daemonization should be optional. The above unit file works fine for something that doesn't fork itself away. (I'm not sure how systemd works with daemonizing processes, never tried. In any case, it's unnecessary.) If you do need it (so the user can start your program from the command line), I strongly recommend picking up a module off PyPI; there are actually a lot of little details that people will expect you to have gotten right. May as well bury it all away in a little daemonize() call :) ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 10:26 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ CHIN Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 12:00 -0700
Halfway point between interactive and daemon? Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 12:27 -0700
Re: Halfway point between interactive and daemon? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 22:49 +0300
Re: Halfway point between interactive and daemon? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 06:32 +1000
csiph-web