Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73886
| Date | 2014-07-03 10:03 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> |
| Subject | Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? |
| References | <mailman.11386.1404248789.18130.python-list@python.org> <iq27r9p1gg7nampcd6rr0pftrshinm9oog@4ax.com> <lp0i1p$3gn$1@ger.gmane.org> <loom.20140703T005928-903@post.gmane.org> <lp2l1n$et6$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11445.1404376403.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 07/03/2014 06:09 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > > Yes, but what puzzled me is that running > subprocess.check_output(r'pyflakes c:\programs\python34\lib') > in the regular interpreter *does* produce output instead of the error > message. My guess is that it fills up the pipe, so that check_output > starts reading the pipe long before pyflakes exits with status 1. > > Hmm. I tried it again, and I see some but not all of the output I got at > the command line *and* I see the exit status message. So the subprocess > must get some of the output but then stop when it sees the exit status. > Thanks. > For a partial explanation try this: from the command line (again my path is slightly different): pyflakes C:\Python34\lib > stdout.txt this will still give you a few lines of output and these should be the same ones you're seeing from the python interpreter when you're doing: subprocess.check_output(r'pyflakes C:\Python34\lib') ==> pyflakes sends these lines to stderr instead of stdout !! confirmation: subprocess.check_output(r'pyflakes C:\Python34\lib', stderr=subprocess.PIPE) and the output is gone. So the remaining questions are: - why on earth is pyflakes sending these lines (and only these) to stderr ? - what is happening to the stderr output when run in IDLE ? I guess it is caught and suppressed somewhere, but to add to your observations the check_output call doesn't hang on IDLE, but finishes eventually with no output other than the traceback. Best wishes, Wolfgang
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-07-01 17:05 -0400
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2014-07-01 21:33 -0700
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-07-02 05:05 -0400
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-07-02 19:31 +0200
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-07-02 19:37 +0200
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-07-02 19:14 -0400
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-07-02 23:22 +0000
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-07-02 16:54 -0700
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-07-03 00:09 -0400
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-07-03 10:03 +0200
Re: Success with subprocess communicate on Windows? Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-07-03 11:22 +0200
csiph-web