Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56747
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: What version of glibc is Python using? |
| Date | 2013-10-12 11:59 -0400 |
| References | (2 earlier) <l3as90$5bk$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.1030.1381562417.18130.python-list@python.org> <l3av5f$gi2$1@dont-email.me> <l3b294$kkv$2@ger.gmane.org> <CALwzidnBLYrQrdbYWjEA4qbbidpDW81DTR2=ok3g8aHvckSVag@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1041.1381593581.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 10/12/2013 7:43 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote: >> On 10/12/2013 3:53 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote: >>> >>> That function is really bogus. It states itself, that it has "intimate >>> knowledge of how different libc versions add symbols to the executable >>> and thus is probably only useable for executables compiled using gcc" >>> which is just another way of saying "it'll become outdated and broken >>> soon". It's not even done by reading the symbol table, it opens the >>> binary and matches a RE *shocked* I would have expected such hacks in a >>> shell script. >>> >>> glibc has a function for this: >>> >>> gnu_get_libc_version () >>> >>> which should be used. Was this always presence and missed, or has it been added in say, the last 10 years? >> So *please* submit a patch with explanation. > > Easier said than done. The module is currently written in pure > Python, and the comment "Note: Please keep this module compatible to > Python 1.5.2" would appear to rule out the use of ctypes to call the > glibc function. I wonder though whether that comment is really still > appropriate. I do not see that line in the 3.4 version. Anyway, submit a patch with explanation and assign the issue to "lemburg", who is the maintainer. (He sells 3rd party add-ons and obvious uses this function for those.) He can decide if a conditional (>2.4) is needed. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What version of glibc is Python using? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-11 23:34 -0700
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-12 08:50 +0200
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-12 00:03 -0700
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-10-12 00:20 -0700
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-12 09:53 +0200
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2013-10-12 10:34 +0200
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-12 04:46 -0400
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-12 05:43 -0600
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-12 13:08 +0000
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-12 20:02 +0100
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-13 00:45 -0700
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-12 11:59 -0400
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-12 14:28 -0600
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2013-10-13 10:43 -0700
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-13 19:06 +0100
Re: What version of glibc is Python using? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-10-13 12:06 -0600
csiph-web