Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #195198
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale |
| Date | 2025-05-28 22:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <m9p8s0Fqfm8U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1016lp6$afb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-05-28 11:41, Marion wrote:
> Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU
> banned their iPhone for sale in the EU - due to not meeting bare minimum
> lifetime battery-life specs which my $190 (or so) 2021 free Samsung Galaxy
> A32-5G *doubles* (because it doesn't have a crappy battery, that's why).
> <https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en>
>
> I will NOT post to this thread until *after* that date when the news will
> be obvious that only the iPhone 15/16 meet the EU's minimum lifetime specs.
>
> It will be interesting to see $200 Androids which *double* that spec; but
> let's just wait to see which devices *meet* bare minimum battery lifetimes.
You are shifting the goalposts.
You said:
+++·························
From: Marion <marion@facts.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: My week with Linux: I'm dumping Windows for Ubuntu to see how it goes
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 20:27:05 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1012iqo$101r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
...
You brazenly denied what is extremely well known to be public since it
involves an EU ruling which about battery life that Apple had to ask the EU
to postpone so that Apple could make at least one iPhone that (barely) met
minimum battery-life standards - and - after you denying this extremely
well known public information - you demanded that I back it up - which
takes two seconds to find (more to copy and paste) to make your life easy.
·························++-
We demanded you post a source for this. An EU rule about Apple batteries not meeting the EU criteria that everybody knows about. This rule was in the past, according to your claim. It takes two seconds to find this, you claimed. We failed to find this (I asked chatgpt for it). You have failed to post any reliable link in three days, not the two seconds you claimed.
Now you are shifting to a ruling in the future.
And please remember that I have a track record of never buying Apple hardware, thus I can hardly be an Apple Troll. I am ready to believe your claim, but you still have to post the single link to the single paper where the EU says that Apple Batteries now are not up to EU criteria.
Post that single link, or admit you lied, and I will shut up.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-05-28 09:41 +0000 Re: Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-05-28 10:44 +0100 Re: Placeholder for Arlen the Apple troll - crying that the mean ole' EU did not ban any iPhones. (was: Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale) Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-05-28 13:33 +0000 Re: Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-05-28 22:09 +0200 Re: Placeholder for June 20, 2025 - Apple trolls - crying that the mean ole' EU banned their iPhone for sale Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-05-28 17:13 -0700
csiph-web