Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #672502
| Subject | Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux |
| References | (1 earlier) <usndfjpf9lljrk7ejilvj0ohb0mv5du6tl@4ax.com> <al0nfj9nfohkju0dnabghk1cjvek5hbr87@4ax.com> <vdg79h$2l0ka$1@dont-email.me> <3NmdnUtfTvJIsmP7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vdmjau$3q93c$2@dont-email.me> |
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Date | 2024-10-03 23:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lmidnegRQ_0-_GL7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 10/3/24 1:13 PM, Rich wrote: > In comp.os.linux.misc 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >> Optical disks - esp M-Disks - can LAST ... but they >> are LOW-DENSITY by today's defs by a BIG margin. >> It's also not clear if you'd be able to FIND a >> DVD reader device 25 years from now. Even most >> current PCs/laptops don't COME with those anymore. > > Which is exactly the problem. > > Your DVD 'media' might survive 1,000 years. But if you can't buy a DVD > reader for any price, all that 'media' is useless. > > We've already seen that issue before. Try to find a Zip disk or > SuperDisk drive. If any could be purchased, they would all be from > places like eBay and of questionable operational quality. I actually HAVE a gen-1 ZipDisk - parallel port. They were supposed to be The Future :-) Now nothing even comes with a parallel port. Does anybody sell a USB->DB25 Parallel ? Ah : https://www.amazon.com/C2G-16899-Parallel-Printer-Adapter/dp/B000UX21PY/ref=sr_1_6?dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.1VI8pfXqbYFCqzemMpvwSeS7sWlXF85-8KCEE02Eq0U5ijmY6VQsHDd4jiHTJdbXneNSTAjv0kQYw5VX4GdbqyTSunox50IwAfWTs_yauKlzZUkYaW-1O0zu_K-T2aZ-lucb5yIPkraxSzUvcjoEALqE4U6n0B54UxrIA4O_XuR08eLCcjsrjV-zuudG7_iyjE76TOIVN5lFDy-JxuJ6Z9LWfk4rkdxNqfT1bg0KjN0.sM52_QZ_SQzD3giWHwr3zXrQaCEJ8eYQR17c0YfJzW8&dib_tag=se&keywords=parallel+to+usb+adapter&qid=1728012393&sr=8-6 Linux drivers ??????? > The reality is the only way to 'archive' is to periodically copy one's > archived data to newer storage systems, which involves at least the > work of the actual copy process (and which must occur before the > mechanical devices for the old media fail) and of verification that the > copy process did not itself corrupt the data. Exactly what I said ... "forward replication". It's actual WORK alas ..... "Cloud" also - but remember that the cloud can go away in a number of fashions - and not just Vlad and his boyz. Oh well, back to baked clay tablets - proven 9Kyear retention and you don't need a reading device :-)
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-10-01 07:04 +0200
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 01:08 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-01 03:10 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-03 01:47 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-10-03 15:34 +0000
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-10-03 17:13 +0000
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-03 23:31 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-04 02:12 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2024-10-05 07:01 +0200
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-05 07:41 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-10-05 21:03 +0000
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> - 2024-10-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-04 00:35 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-03 02:28 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-10-03 03:10 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-10-04 01:04 -0400
Re: Alternative to Optical Storage???? Zach Standig <zstandig@kmbs.konicaminolta.us> - 2024-10-01 15:51 -0400
csiph-web