Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Speech activated scripting without Natlink...

From	John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.beta
Subject	Speech activated scripting without Natlink...
Date	2014-01-12 01:19 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<lasqi4$50m$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Why are Vocola, Dragonfly, Unimacro, and Advanced Scripting 
integrated into speech recognition? So that NaturallySpeaking can 
distinguish between what is a command and what is dictation? Speech 
activated scripting is light years better than keystroke activated 
scripting, but what's the point in integrating the dictation with the 
commands? To activate by keystrokes, you press the keystroke 
combination and then the script is executed. To activate by voice, 
speech recognition must translate it to text anyways. So, just like 
using a keystroke combination, you can simply use the output of 
speech recognition, as long as you have some way of determining what 
is dictation and what is a command. So why not take it from the SR 
output? 

To be continued...

I'm still rebuilding my computer desk area. Need to finish the mouse 
pad/platform. Since I was spending 12 hours a day sitting down, I 
bought one of those fitball seating discs. Seems to work reasonably 
well when underinflated.

Back to comp.lang.beta | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Speech activated scripting without Natlink... John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> - 2014-01-12 01:19 +0000
  Re: Speech activated scripting without Natlink... John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> - 2014-01-12 20:34 +0000
    Re: Speech activated scripting without Natlink... Mr. Anderson <matrixlove@yahoo.com> - 2014-01-12 17:31 -0600
      Re: Speech activated scripting without Natlink... John Doe <jdoe@usenetlove.invalid> - 2014-01-13 02:10 +0000
        Re: Speech activated scripting without Natlink... Mr. Anderson <matrixlove@yahoo.com> - 2014-01-13 18:02 -0600

csiph-web