Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #211022
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded, uk.comp.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip |
| Date | 2013-12-16 15:16 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <l8n5fh$mdp$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <l8infh$2o5$1@reader1.panix.com> <OZ5ru.15342$az1.6188@fx34.am4> <l8lbic$g6q$2@reader1.panix.com> <03sru.770233$i75.479117@fx03.iad> <VZyru.1623$zI3.453@fx31.am4> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2013-12-16, 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote:
> unruh wrote:
>
>>>>>> Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.valuewalk.com/2013/12/google-inc-goog-considers-face-off-with-intel-corporation-intc/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typically Intel chips waste 90% of the power that goes into
>>
>> Actually I suspect it is far higher than that.
>
>
> I see where the conversation is going.
> What I meant was relative to an ARM chip.
Of course that's what you meant. :) And that sounds about right to me.
However, the laws of Usenet require that even slightly vague
statements be interpreted in the manner that provides the most fuel
for a good debate (and the more esoteric the resulting discussion, the
better).
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! It's OKAY -- I'm an
at INTELLECTUAL, too.
gmail.com
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-14 21:18 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-14 22:52 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-14 23:38 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-12-14 16:01 -0800
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-12-14 18:16 -0600
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-15 22:47 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-16 00:45 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-16 02:08 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-16 03:30 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-16 08:38 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-16 15:16 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-16 08:38 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-16 08:38 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-16 08:38 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-16 17:51 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-16 21:56 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-17 00:10 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 16:23 -0800
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-12-17 03:53 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-12-16 21:10 -0700
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 20:25 -0800
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-12-16 22:40 -0700
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 20:19 -0800
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-12-17 07:21 -0600
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2013-12-17 08:35 -0500
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-12-17 13:30 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-12-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-12-17 03:30 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-17 03:48 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-12-17 18:44 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-17 19:42 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-12-17 19:40 +0000
Re: Google set to make its own energy efficient ARM Server chip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-12-14 18:15 -0600
csiph-web