Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #32399

Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces

Show all headers | View raw

On 2012-10-29, Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> wrote:

> I'm currently looking for a good solution to the following problem: I
> have two classes A and B, which interact with each other and which
> interact with the user. Instances of B are always created by A.
>
> Now I want A to call some private methods of B and vice versa (i.e.
> what C++ "friends" are), but I want to make it hard for the user to
> call these private methods.

The Python way of telling a user not to call certain methods is to
prefix their names with an underscore.  The double-underscore thing
that munges the names is just telling that a bit louder -- but they're
still free to ignore that advice.

> Currently my ugly approach is this: I delare the internal methods
> private (hide from user). Then I have a function which gives me a
> dictionary of callbacks to the private functions of the other
> objects. This is in my opinion pretty ugly (but it works and does
> what I want).

By "decleare them privide" do you mean using __ASDF__ name-munging?

It sounds to me like you're just making life hard on yourself.

> I'm pretty damn sure there's a nicer (prettier) solution out there,
> but I can't currently think of it. Do you have any hints?

IMO, the "right" thing to do in Python is to use single underscore
names for methods that you intend to be called by "friend" modules (is
that correct C++ lingo?) but don't intend to be called by the
end-user.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! I just had a NOSE
                                  at               JOB!!
                              gmail.com            

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 17:33 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 16:41 +0000
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2012-10-29 09:41 -0700
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 03:47 +1100
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 17:58 +0100
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-29 10:03 -0700
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-29 18:00 +0000
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 13:09 -0600
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-29 16:52 +0000
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-10-29 18:01 +0100
      Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-29 18:17 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-10-29 18:06 +0100
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-29 22:37 +0000
  Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-10-29 18:37 -0700
    Re: Nice solution wanted: Hide internal interfaces andrea crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-10-30 14:15 +0000

csiph-web