Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4396
| From | tmcd@tmcd-p4-linux.austin.tx.us (Tim McDaniel) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: About using assertion |
| Date | 2011-05-21 18:37 -0500 |
| Organization | Tim McDaniel's home IBM-PC clone running Linux |
| Message-ID | <juula8-jc3.ln1@tmcd-linux-p4.austin.tx.us> (permalink) |
| References | <f1e4cc83-8596-4e53-bed7-34a5209fe8c4@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <92r0e9F6lvU1@mid.individual.net> <sjmea8-067.ln1@tmcd-linux-p4.austin.tx.us> <se-dnUMuGp0Fj0jQnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
In article <se-dnUMuGp0Fj0jQnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> wrote:
>Negative zero is a strange beast. As far as I can tell, it exists
>mainly to produce negative infinity when it is used as a divisor. For
>example, it is equal to zero for comparison purposes.
Hm, I thought it didn't, but the authoritative-looking but old
<http://www.concentric.net/~ttwang/tech/javafloat.htm> says otherwise.
However, Float/Double apparently acts differently from float/double:
Comparing two Java "Float" objects can have different semantics
than comparing two Java "float" values. Recall the "float" class
is a Java primitive class, while java.lang.Float is a subclass of
"Object".
A "NaN" value is not equal to itself. However, a "NaN" Java
"Float" object is equal to itself. The semantic is defined this
way, because otherwise "NaN" Java "Float" objects cannot be
retrieved from a hash table.
(new Float(0.0 / 0.0)).equals(new Float(0.0 / 0.0)) -> true
For the class java.lang.Float, objects are ordered from lowest to
highest: -Infinity, negative numbers, -0.0, 0.0, positive numbers,
Infinity, NaN. "java.lang.Double" objects are identically ordered.
(new Float(0.0)).equals(new Float(-0.0)) -> false
--
Tim McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd@panix.com
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: About using assertion tmcd@tmcd-p4-linux.austin.tx.us (Tim McDaniel) - 2011-05-19 00:32 -0500
Re: About using assertion Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 08:34 +0200
Re: About using assertion Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 08:46 -0400
Re: About using assertion Michal Kleczek <kleku75@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 15:16 +0200
Re: About using assertion Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 09:38 -0400
Re: About using assertion Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-19 07:41 -0700
Re: About using assertion Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 11:00 -0400
Re: About using assertion Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-19 05:52 -0700
Re: About using assertion tmcd@tmcd-p4-linux.austin.tx.us (Tim McDaniel) - 2011-05-21 18:37 -0500
Re: About using assertion Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-21 19:00 -0700
Re: About using assertion Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-22 01:19 -0400
csiph-web