Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc > #301

Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG

From "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc
Subject Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG
Date 2012-05-29 00:31 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jq1jes$k8i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <jprsdt$jlq$1@dont-email.me> <jpst27$3d2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnjs549e.ufc.marcov@turtle.stack.nl> <jpunv4$490$1@dont-email.me> <jpv7gc$s9l$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


"S.G"  wrote in message news:jpv7gc$s9l$1@speranza.aioe.org...

>> 2. Delphi 3 or later or C++Builder 3 or later.

> That's what I currently see there.

> I have used older era Apro versions also in D3, back in nineties.

The documentation appears to be for an earlier commercial version. The 
download is for version 5.00:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/tpapro/

The readme states:

where <Compiler> is one of:
  <D7>        -- for Delphi 7.
  <D2005>     -- for Delphi 2005.  (win 32 target).
  <D2007>     -- for Delphi 2006 and Delphi 2007.
  <D2010>     -- for Delphi 2010.

And the document PDFs in the download are for older versions from around 
2001 where D3 was specified.

Hopefully the ComDrv32 package will meet my needs. I'll have a better idea 
if I use it in my www.ortmaster.com software, but that's a major project and 
unfortunately not designed well enough to make the conversion easy. It was 
my first Delphi project (~2003) and for quite while I did not have a proper 
grasp of OOP. And I'm still weak in that aspect of programming. I made my 
first Windows app using BorlandC++, but I also had C4 and a friend uses 
Delphi professionally and recommended that I use it.

The other library I found specifies D5 and above in the readme file, but the 
packages include packages for D3 and D4:
    package CPortLib4;

Thanks,

Paul 

Back to comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-26 20:27 -0400
  Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-26 21:08 -0400
  Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-27 12:44 +0300
    Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Marco van de Voort <marcov@turtle.stack.nl> - 2012-05-27 20:40 +0000
      Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-27 22:29 -0400
        Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-28 08:55 +0200
          Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-28 11:08 -0400
          Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 00:31 -0400
            Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-05-29 07:34 +0000
            Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "S.G" <S.G@none.special.ch> - 2012-05-29 11:09 +0200
              Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 06:20 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-29 08:35 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-29 11:43 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@peschoen.com> - 2012-05-30 03:10 -0400
                Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> - 2012-05-30 11:01 -0400
    Re: Serial port component, ComDrv32 vs SerialNG "P E Schoen" <paul@pstech-inc.com> - 2016-08-18 19:50 -0400

csiph-web