Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2559435

--DRAFT #1 PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT (WORKING TITLE)

From dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, ny.general, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Subject --DRAFT #1 PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT (WORKING TITLE)
Date 2022-06-02 05:19 +1000
Message-ID <jfpse4F5htgU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <jfgfh3F8ofjU1@mid.individual.net> <jfi0r1Fht8rU1@mid.individual.net> <jfilvlFlm92U1@mid.individual.net> <jfkvidF4picU2@mid.individual.net> <jfliocF849dU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


-- (DRAFT) PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT

(c) 2022 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 1 June 2022

Before we consider DE ZENGOTITA's next chapter on "THE CULT OF THE 
CHILD" as comprising some 50 pages in not being an academic treatise we 
ought to again express the cautionary caveat that neither is ours. The 
aggregating of our various contemplations into chapters as then a 
digestation of his book thus far, is primarily concerned with devising a 
META-NARRATIVE so as to articulate any viability to a METALOGIC process 
and such is then augmented with relative textual notes to further 
contextually assist any comprehensibility as informal research.

Whilst it may not ever then evolve into an acceptable final publishing 
form, such does not preclude our considerations from having any 
intermediate capability to facilitate generation of ideas as a self 
education process.

Our starting premise as entirely a presumptuous perspective (ie. for 
which we may not derive any satisfaction from his considered discourse) 
for a reasoned avenue of enquiry into his elucidation of the subject, is 
entirely an imaginary as hypothetical scenario.

That is a consideration where as the usual manner of life, an individual 
is routinely, subject to the expression, "YOU ARE A HORRIBLE PERSON".

YOUTUBE: "YOU'RE TERRIBLE MURIEL"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xm_7FLKRS4Y>

The hypothesis that a language's vocabulary (among other features) 
shapes or defines its speakers' view of the world, has been largely 
discredited.  But what of the hearer to whom the words have been 
repeatedly directed?

Especially given the following explanation: "Cognitive or mental tics 
are thoughts, phrases, urges, songs, words, scenes that intrude into 
consciousness, and are difficult to remove, so causing irritation to the 
person. They are not to be confused with obsessions. Obsessions are 
usually coherent doubts or images about aversive events or thoughts. 
Mental tics are neutral or pleasant or stimulating – at least initially. 
Obsessions are part of an obsession–compulsion sequence where an 
aversive thought leads on to bad consequences. Mental tics are sequences 
in themselves. The person does not report bad consequences related to 
mental tics, and one mental tic does not necessarily chain on to other 
mental tics, although, unlike obsessions, tics can be substituted." 
<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9780470713518.app3>

Ignoring for the present, the possibility of any language variance (ie. 
the same phrase within another language will yield a different reverse 
transcriptase measure irrespective of its ability to manifest a similar 
consequence) or of any capacity for cultural resilience due to social 
stoic conditioning or its machoism norms.

As clearly then only a hypothetical conception, on what ONTIC grounding 
effect (ie. shown here is a sketch of some IDEA correspondence to the 
DEME: @235 / ONTIC @234 aggregations) would such an expression 
reasonably have (ie. no doubt there is a spectrum between the two polar 
extremities) upon one's ontological experience as life lived?

[YOU, {@1: Sup: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#61 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED 
{%22}); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#7)}
ARE, {@2: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH 
THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#22)}
A, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#76 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%4}); Ego: 
1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#23)}
HORRIBLE, {@4: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED 
{%24}); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#74)}
PERSON] {@5: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); 
Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#125)}

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #235 = @61 + @76 + @98

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #234 = @68 + @166

#235 as [#6, #20, #1, #200, #8] = ʼôrach (H734): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = 
#4} 1) way, path; 1a) path, road; 1b) the path, way, *PASSING* *OF* 
*LIFE* (fig.); 1c) way of living (fig.); 1d) traveller, wayfarer (meton);

#235 as [#30, #3, #2, #200] = geber (H1397): {UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41} 
1) man, strong man, warrior (*EMPHASISING* *STRENGTH* *OR* *ABILITY* 
*TO* *FIGHT*);

#235 as [#10, #4, #10, #1, #10, #200] = ídios (G2398): {UMBRA: #294 % 
#41 = #7} 1) *PERTAINING* *TO* *ONE'S* *SELF*, one's own, belonging to 
one's self;

#234 as [#6, #10, #200, #10, #2, #6] = rîyb (H7378): {UMBRA: #212 % #41 
= #7} 1) *TO* *STRIVE*, *CONTEND*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to strive; i) 
physically; ii) *WITH* *WORDS*; 1a2) *TO* *CONDUCT* *A* *CASE**OR* 
*SUIT* (*LEGAL*), *SUE*; 1a3) to make complaint; 1a4) to quarrel; 1b) 
(Hiphil) to contend against;

#234 as [#30, #200, #4] = râdad (H7286): {UMBRA: #208 % #41 = #3} 1) 
*TO* *BEAT* *DOWN*, beat out, *SUBDUE*; 1a) (Qal) to beat down (fig); 
1b) (Hiphil) to beat out;

#234 as [#6, #40, #90, #30, #8, #10, #700] = tsᵉlach (H6744): {UMBRA: 
#128 % #41 = #5} 1) to prosper; 1a) (Aphel); 1a1) to cause to prosper; 
1a2) show prosperity, be prosperous, have *SUCCESS*, be successful;

Is it possible to logically represent the osmosis process to any adverse 
phenomenological contingency (ie. shown here is only a conceptual 
noumenon and logical example: @234 --> #420 / #449; @235 --> #449 / #314 
and it is not the theoretical impetus for any prognosis) and then vary 
the NURTURE (supernal) / NATURE (ego) teleological dynamic accordingly 
in compliance with the parenting guidelines or sapient advice of those 
professionally skilled (ie. I don't pretend to be either) in resolving 
such quandaries of life?

It is not within our providence (ie. and again this is not a 
dissertation for a PhD) to provide any such answers, except to say that 
we have an intelligent criteria for our expectations in undertaking the 
task before us which lays outside the quadrant as any feral (Latin: 
ferus meaning uncivilized, uncultivated untamed, rough, cruel) 
proclivity for mere amusement.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Empowerment.pdf>

Initial Post: 1 June 2022

-- 
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor 
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[S|T] 
as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

--DRAFT #1 PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA AND ITS RATIONALE OF EMPOWERMENT (WORKING TITLE) dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2022-06-02 05:19 +1000

csiph-web