Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #18247

Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit?

From "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit?
Date 2011-04-24 21:39 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ip2jde$3j9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Why do these retards tell multiple LIES each day that can easily be proven 
to be total and complete bullshit?

How stupid are these idiots to post idiotic lies like this and think that 
nobody will realize that they're lying sacks of shit?



<quote>
(Rex Ballard - Last week)
MS spends $8 billion/year in legal costs and settlements to address criminal 
acts it's admitted in court - but settled prior to exhausting all appeals.
</quote>

<FACT>
(From the official SEC filing)
General and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 billion or 28%, primarily 
due to decreased costs for legal settlements and contingencies. We incurred 
$283 million of legal charges during the twelve months ended June 30, 2009 
as compared to $1.8 billion during the twelve months ended June 30, 2008. 
The prior year costs were primarily related to the European Commission fine 
of $1.4 billion (899 million pounds).
</FACT>



<quote>
(Dumb Willy - Today)
In their SEC filing M$ (guess)estimates Linux users at 10-12% & possibly as 
much as 14%, & warns that this can affect their business & drop in revenue.
</quote>

<FACT>
Official SEC filing says no such thing
   http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312511026916/d8k.htm
</FACT





<quote>
(High Plains Nymshifter - Today)
Oh, and I noticed the crosspost to c.s.m.advocacy, a flatfish Wintrolling 
trademark.
</quote>


<FACT>
From: flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com>
Subject: So Where Were You HPT?
Message-ID: <609a2uzcd1hp.z24nvz6249jo$.dlg@40tude.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy


From: 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com>
Subject: Re: So Where Were You HPT?
Message-ID: p%Ssp.5327$Pi.1900@newsfe22.ams2
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
</FACT>



<quote>
My new title - "European Inventor of the Year 1995"
</quote>

<FACT>
The "advocate" calling itself  7 is a lying piece of shit.
</FACT>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-24 21:39 -0400
  Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 21:54 -0400
    Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 04:52 +0100
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 23:19 -0400
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 05:54 +0100
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 00:20 -0400
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 11:11 +0100
              Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:19 -0400
                Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 16:50 +0100
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:45 -0400
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:20 -0400
              Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:27 -0400
                Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2011-04-26 05:16 +0000
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 14:49 +0200
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-25 16:20 +0100
            Re: Why are so many "Hadrons" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-04-25 15:39 -0400
              Re: Why are so many "Hadrons" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 15:46 -0400
              Re: Why are so many "Hadrons" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 22:10 +0200
                Re: Why are so many "Hadrons" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 16:15 -0400
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:56 +0000
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-25 08:17 -0400
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:54 +0000
              Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 14:17 -0400
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:42 -0400
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 09:01 -0500
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:24 -0400
  Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-24 22:21 -0400
    Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:34 -0400
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Big Steel <Steel9901x22@9901x22Steel.com> - 2011-04-24 22:52 -0400
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-04-24 22:54 -0400
  Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 14:50 +0100
    Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-25 15:51 +0100
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 11:13 -0400
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:16 -0400
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 11:25 -0400
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:28 +0200
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-04-25 21:59 +0200
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 16:59 +0100
      Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 16:24 +0100
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 10:30 -0500
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 11:33 -0400
          Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 16:55 +0100
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-25 09:03 -0700
              Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2011-04-25 17:23 +0100
                Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Big Steel <Steel98@steel98.com> - 2011-04-25 12:28 -0400
                Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-25 09:39 -0700
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 12:14 -0400
            Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-04-25 22:04 +0200
        Re: Why are so many "advocates" PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 11:43 -0400
  Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 08:58 -0500
    Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:01 -0400
    Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-25 07:09 -0700
      Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 10:22 -0400
        Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 10:02 -0500
          Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? Big Steel <Steel98@steel98.com> - 2011-04-25 11:04 -0400
          Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 11:33 -0400
        Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 10:48 -0500
          Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2011-04-25 08:55 -0700
            Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 13:19 -0400
              Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 12:48 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "caged steel" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 13:58 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 14:09 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 13:20 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 17:32 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 19:59 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 20:22 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:29 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-04-26 15:40 +0100
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 11:28 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? "robo-rob" <CS@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 13:21 -0400
          Re: Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be lying pieces of shit? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-04-25 12:12 -0400
        Why are so many Wintrolls PROVEN to be brainless twits Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 19:28 +0100
          Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 14:38 -0400
            Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 13:50 -0500
              Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2011-04-25 22:59 +0100
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-25 18:51 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:43 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-26 08:19 -0700
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-26 07:40 -0500
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits An Old Friend <an.old@friend.com.invalid> - 2011-04-26 16:41 +0100
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-26 08:19 -0700
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchmail.com> - 2011-04-26 11:37 -0400
                Re: Why are so many Advocates  PROVEN to be brainless twits Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-04-26 08:50 -0700

csiph-web