Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > alt.religion.scientology > #130243
| From | Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.religion.scientology, alt.religion.scientology.xenu, rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.misc, talk.religion.misc |
| Subject | Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day |
| Date | 2026-03-22 09:00 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <id40sk1hl9tlk9084mkq91htc655jdetrt@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0001HW.2F63856F015C9E4D30B3F238F@news.eternal-september.org> <10pjjbj$1jru2$1@dont-email.me> <okdtrklgqd5uigvq4kchnkslmajq54g0h0@4ax.com> <10pmetl$2iijt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 09:53:29 -0600, ShyDavid
<noreply@murdermingle.com> wrote:
>On 2026/03/21 9:20 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:50:46 -0600, David Rice
>> <noreply@murdermingle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2026/03/12 5:36 PM, David Dalton wrote:
>>>> Happy L. Ron Hubbard Day (March 13) to SF fans and
>>>> to scientologists.
>>>
>>> "SF fans" do not read crap.
>>>
>>> {alt.atheism removed}
>>
>> I recently saw /Battlefield: Earth/. I skipped it when it came out
>> because of the reviews and the competition (at the time I had the time
>> to watch one new a week in a theater).
>>
>> It was better than I expected. A bit cartoony, but watchable. The
>> story was easy to follow, which is better than being so badly done
>> that you end up not knowing what was going on. IOW, I've seen worse
>> films, oh yes indeed.
>
>
>Gosh. I recall holysmoke.org has over 300 reviews, none of them positive. I suppose it has reached the "campy" state that makes the film good. :-)
My expectations were low, so being better than I expected does not
necessarily make it "good". And "watchable" is not "good".
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
Back to alt.religion.scientology | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-12 21:06 -0230
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2026-03-14 14:55 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Rice <noreply@murdermingle.com> - 2026-03-20 07:50 -0600
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-03-20 09:21 -0700
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2026-03-20 15:26 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-20 20:09 -0230
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-20 22:09 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-21 04:57 +0000
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day ShyDavid <noreply@murdermingle.com> - 2026-03-21 08:03 -0600
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-20 20:50 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2026-03-21 08:20 -0700
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day ShyDavid <noreply@murdermingle.com> - 2026-03-21 09:53 -0600
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2026-03-22 09:00 -0700
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 15:12 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-23 16:43 -0400
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2026-03-23 21:10 +0000
Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2026-03-21 12:53 -0400
csiph-web