Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.radio.amateur > #341343

Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 18/07/2019 16:14, Stephen Cole wrote:
>> Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2019 12:07, John Rumm wrote:
>>>> On 18/07/2019 12:59, Stephen Cole wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> With the polling period having now closed, all votes have been tallied and
>>>>> verified. The result of the ukram user poll to determine whether or not
>>>>> Jim’s (James Stewart GM4DHJ) postings to ukram all be held up for moderator
>>>>> group consultation prior to authorisation in order to better screen out his
>>>>> disruptive and malicious trolling, and the result is that 100% of all votes
>>>>> cast voted YES. It’s a landslide, folks. Jim should be put on special
>>>>> measures, in line with the wishes of ukram’s users.
>>> 
>>>>> Can the ukram moderators kindly update the thread with details as to how
>>>>> this user decision will be implemented, along with a timescale? Thanks.
>>> 
>>>> So WTF post that here in uk.d-i-y, an unmoderated group?
>>> 
>>> It's called 'negative attention seeking'; it's something people tend to
>>> grow out of by the age of 3. He's being shunned over in ukra, so he's
>>> come here instead to fuck over this group (as well as the management
>>> groups), his grand plans for Usenet domination having failed elsewhere.
>>> Just KF the jerk.
>> 
>> That’s some quite impressive levels of gotten to, Burt. You ok, mate?
>> 
> Spuke uses the f-bomb! The gotten-to is unbelievably strong with this one.
>

Burt’d have us believe that when he was at “the age of 3” he’d just
single-handedly won the war and driven back the Nazi threat. If he knew
then that he was going to end up whiling away his final months and weeks on
this Earth by constantly replacing snapped-off car aerials whilst losing
his dignity on Usenet, I doubt he’d have bothered. 

> Will he survive the weekend shit delivery to his letterbox and the loss 
> of another car aerial now the schools have started holiday in 
> Englandlandshire? He'll be dangerously gotten-to if that happens and he 
> misses out on the cheap M&S meal deal.

Burt seems so gotten to that I reckon he fell victim to the old “dog dirt
smeared under car door handle” prank. An absolute classic!

-- 
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Back to uk.radio.amateur | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

POLL: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-10 17:24 +0000
  Re: POLL: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-10 17:24 +0000
  Re: POLL: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2019-07-10 18:38 +0100
    Re: POLL: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-10 18:04 +0000
  POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-18 11:59 +0000
    Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> - 2019-07-18 13:07 +0100
      Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-07-18 13:13 +0000
        Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 14:19 +0100
          Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-18 14:24 +0100
            Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 14:30 +0100
              Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-18 14:33 +0100
                Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 16:11 +0100
                Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-18 15:44 +0000
                Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-07-18 18:54 +0100
        Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-18 15:14 +0000
          Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-07-19 19:33 +0100
            Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-07-19 20:00 +0000
      Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 14:19 +0100
      Re: Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-07-18 15:32 +0100
        Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 16:12 +0100
          Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-07-18 16:51 +0100
            Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-07-18 16:58 +0100
              Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim’s posting rights to ukram Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2019-07-18 17:23 +0000
      Re: POLL RESULT: re Jim's posting rights to ukram "Brian Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2019-07-18 16:09 +0100

csiph-web