Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #59302
| From | felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.tv |
| Subject | Re: This might be better than Monster Cable |
| Date | 2017-03-31 15:30 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ek64cmF65seU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ek3fngFkkp6U1@mid.individual.net> <objutc$1thu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ek5gfkF2slrU1@mid.individual.net> <ek6415F64gcU2@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 3:25 PM, Rod Speed wrote: > > > "felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message > news:ek5gfkF2slrU1@mid.individual.net... >> On Friday, 31 Mar 2017 8:55 AM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote: >>>> https://www.4cabling.com.au/304-8-m-detachable-fibre-optic-hdmi-cable.html >>>> >>>> >>>> :) >>>> >>> Better for connecting devices that are a long distance apart. >> >> yes. it was a bit of joke tho as ppl rubbish me about my praise of >> monster cables. >> >>> >>> Ought to be cheaper to stream video over a network to a computer >>> with the HDMI output at the screen, but simpler and easier to >>> use this I suppose. The shorter cables would be more economical >>> in that regard. >>> >> >> there are shorter lengths. but I wonder how long it will be before >> optical cables become the norm? > > Forever with those distances. I suspect that AV equipment will eventually use optical interconnect cables > >> or maybe no cables in future, everything connected by wifi. > > Unlikely. surround sound systems have gone wifi > >> also, Samsung now has a tv that has a separate box for connections to >> other equipment and just one optical cable from the box to the panel. > > Stupid way to do things. > > > I think it's a good idea. especially if the tv is wall mounted -- "Multiculturanism equals white ethnocide" http://thereligionofpeace.com http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.siotw.org
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
This might be better than Monster Cable felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-30 15:25 +1100
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-03-30 21:55 +0000
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-03-31 08:11 +1000
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-04-01 01:24 +0000
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 09:51 +1100
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:25 +1100
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 15:30 +1100
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:20 +1100
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-03-31 20:13 +1000
Re: This might be better than Monster Cable felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-03-31 22:08 +1100
csiph-web