Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.hardware > #18031

Re: Memory question

From VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH>
Newsgroups alt.comp.hardware
Subject Re: Memory question
Date 2017-02-13 13:55 -0600
Organization Usenet Elder
Message-ID <egeha2F85nhU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <o7snse$n5q$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Bill Cunningham wrote:

> I have put a new memory stick into my XP x64. I removed two 512 MB
> sticks. This new one is 1024 MB. Why would my system still be saying
> I have 896 MB of ram? Do I need to do something in BIOS? When I had a
> 1024 and a 512 MB in there it was showing I had 1.3 GB of ram.

You sure you are NOT using onboard video instead of a video
daughtercard?  Onboard video has to get some RAM from somewhere so it
steals it from system RAM.  Looks like you are using onboard video and
it is stealing 128MB for its special use.

You might be able to alter the amount the onboard video steals from
system RAM using a BIOS/UEFI setting.  The more RAM you allocate to the
onboard video then the better the video chipset will perform.  Of
course, that means less system RAM for use by the OS and applications.

Here's some example articles (of MANY you can find in an online search):

http://www.pvladov.com/2013/10/increase-intel-hd-graphics-dedicated-video-memory.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_graphics_memory

Don't know what mobo you have since you didn't give any hardware
details.

Back to alt.comp.hardware | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Memory question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2017-02-13 11:47 -0500
  Re: Memory question VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2017-02-13 13:55 -0600
    Re: Memory question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2017-02-13 15:51 -0500
      Re: Memory question VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2017-02-13 20:02 -0600
        Re: Memory question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2017-02-14 11:59 -0500
          Re: Memory question Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-02-14 14:22 -0500
            Re: Memory question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2017-02-15 12:46 -0500
              Re: Memory question Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-02-15 13:04 -0500
  Re: Memory question Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2017-02-14 10:22 +0200
  Re: Memory question philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2017-02-15 07:01 -0600
    Re: Memory question "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2017-02-15 12:48 -0500
      Re: Memory question philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2017-02-15 13:07 -0600

csiph-web