Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #196188
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.mobile.android, uk.telecom.mobile |
| Subject | Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 |
| Date | 2025-07-03 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <dmtijlx3h.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <1014i5n$2lff0$3@dont-email.me> <1041kv9$u53$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <10424u3$392hf$2@dont-email.me> <uq0ijlx6fi.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <1046953$1mrae$1@solani.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2025-07-03 17:55, badgolferman wrote: > Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >> On 2025-07-02 04:18, Alan wrote: >>> On 2025-07-01 14:46, Marion wrote: >>>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 15:45:35 -0400, -hh wrote : >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Absolutely. I agree. Nothing wrong, per se, with a "B" score. >>>>> >>>>> Which means that your claim (still quoted above) that Apple has >>>>> "dismally failed in efficiency." is a flat-out lie. >>>> >>>> You can take it as a lie but I said very clearly the iPhone earned a B. >>>> I said all the Android OEMs earned an A rating. And a G was really bad. >>>> >>>>>> Because Apple advertises they're more "efficient". >>>>>> And yet, they're not. >>>>> >>>>> Incorrect: they've merely not achieved the highest possible score on >>>>> this particular benchmark test that happens to be used in the EU. >>>> >>>> I knew iPhones would fare dismally simply because of the crappy >>>> batteries. >>> >>> And the lying continues. >>> >>> A "B" score on an A-G scale... >>> >>> ...isn't dismal. >> >> Absolutely correct. >> > > Is it just the word “dismal” you object to or are you dismissing the fact > that Apple batteries are inferior because a B grade is better than a C or D > grade? I object to the use of "dismal". If they are grade "B", there are worse classifications, as C, D, E... -- Cheers, Carlos.
Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-01 21:46 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-01 19:18 -0700
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-03 11:58 +0200
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> - 2025-07-03 15:55 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-03 09:06 -0700
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-03 20:10 +0200
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-03 22:35 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-03 15:55 -0700
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-04 03:20 +0200
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-04 07:24 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-07-05 11:45 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-05 15:04 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-07-05 17:14 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-05 17:37 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-07-06 14:49 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-06 17:34 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 19:58 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-07 21:26 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-07-09 20:38 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-07 16:19 -0400
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-07-05 19:59 +0200
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-05 21:36 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-07 16:05 -0400
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Yusuf Khan <yusuf.khan.nospam@ptcl.net.pk> - 2025-07-08 02:34 +0500
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2025-07-04 09:01 +0100
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2025-07-04 19:14 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Tango Romeo <TangoRomero@snope.com> - 2025-07-04 23:12 -0600
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-07-03 22:38 +0000
Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-07-03 15:55 -0700
csiph-web