Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings

From	Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie>
Newsgroups	comp.text.xml
Subject	Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings
Date	2016-02-21 15:41 +0000
Organization	Silmaril Consultants
Message-ID	<diu45fF7ft1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<7e34c25e-3db7-4eaa-a4a1-94779ff87b2a@googlegroups.com> <n9vib1$2anh$3@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> <54d935fd-e3d8-4efd-bd6b-c0e99212407d@googlegroups.com> <na0gps$2r57$2@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17/02/16 01:01, Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <54d935fd-e3d8-4efd-bd6b-c0e99212407d@googlegroups.com>,
>  <frank67x@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Two next questions:
>>
>> 1) Is it really "info_1" to use? or does it have to be 'info_1'?
>> (double quote or single quote)
> 
> You can use either kind of quote.

But they must of course be nested correctly, eg

  "something='quoted'" or 'something="quoted"'

not crossed over.

///Peter
-- 
XML FAQ: http://xml.silmaril.ie/

Back to comp.text.xml | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

xpath deeper level but considering siblings frank67x@gmail.com - 2016-02-16 02:23 -0800
  Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-02-16 16:21 +0000
    Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings frank67x@gmail.com - 2016-02-16 09:16 -0800
      Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-02-17 01:01 +0000
        Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings frank67x@gmail.com - 2016-02-17 00:07 -0800
        Re: xpath deeper level but considering siblings Peter Flynn <peter@silmaril.ie> - 2016-02-21 15:41 +0000

csiph-web