Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #563787

Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call"

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.computer.workshop, alt.survival, comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, talk.politics.guns, alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call"
Date	2020-09-07 12:00 -0700
Organization	Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID	<df2lhj.s2.17.3@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References	<XnsAC30AAD0476EBf9289uiiis@46.165.242.75> <hrl0rhFpln7U2@mid.individual.net> <hrl3j4Fb63iU18@mid.individual.net> <XnsAC31AB3F2275HT1@W6P7.837.6mbbr> <hrlu8qFsmkU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2020-09-06 10:20 p.m., Snit wrote:
> Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> news:hrl3j4Fb63iU18@mid.individual.net Sun, 06 Sep 2020 21:45:09 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2020 at 1:58:25 PM MST, "Mike Easter"
>>> <MikeE@ster.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bobby wrote:
>>>>> regarding the phone call between Gremlin and snit.
>>>>
>>>> Personally I don't have it figured out yet.  And I'm not looking
>>>> for winners or losers; I'm looking to solve a puzzle.
>>>
>>>
>>> To me it is pretty simple:
>>
>> Yes, it is. You got caught lying about my involvement with the bot.
>> I grilled you for an apology. you wrote another lie, I busted you
>> again for that one too. I grilled you for an apology for that one as
>> well. I've succesfully proven you're a liar who doesn't even care to
>> save the lies for big stories, you'll lie about simple shit just as
>> easily. And when you're caught and the pressure isn't taken off of
>> you, you'll resort to trying to intimidate your victim via doxing,
>> besmirchment, stalking, and sliming them. You've yet to do anything
>> different.
>>
>> You will lie your ass off, it doesn't matter how many times others
>> point out the fallacies in your stories, you'll stick to it. Even
>> when you're busted dead to rights, you'll still ignore the facts and
>> proclaim you didn't do what the evidence is clearly showing you did!
>> You couldn't possibly be any more dishonest with yourself and
>> others.
>>
>>
> 
> Is that you, Diesel, telling others to pick one name? Well, they should —
> but why do you think you are entitled to break your own rules?
> 
> Oh, and you
> 
i think i wasn't there

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Bobby <poolplayerbob44@poolplayer.org> - 2020-09-06 20:47 +0000
  Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-07 04:56 +0000
    Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-07 05:18 +0000
    Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-07 05:20 +0000
      Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Rudy Canoza <dip@shit.invalid> - 2020-09-07 07:22 -0600
      Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" % <persent@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 12:00 -0700
        Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-07 19:20 +0000
        Re: Gremlin=0 : Snit=1 "The Infamous Phone Call" Skeeter <Scoot@invalid.invalid> - 2020-09-07 13:46 -0600

csiph-web