Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2 > #26826
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2 |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-18 22:35 -0800 |
| References | <7aa42d46-c7b7-4dfa-b82c-506c1da1705c@googlegroups.com> <5c6c42a6-9e85-4bcf-accc-d66d5823e877@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <c262124a-e37b-4c1e-bbb0-3d0bccd4f9f2@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: KryoFlux or alternatives for *writing* 18-sector disks on real hardware? |
| From | "Michael 'AppleWin Debugger Dev'" <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> |
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:51:52 PM UTC-8, qkumba wrote: > The short answer is yes (use RW18). It was designed to write using regular hardware (Airheart saves the highscores to an 18-sector track; Prince of Persia saves the game state to an 18-sector track). Oh yeah, I never thought to think about saving high scores. Thanks!
Back to comp.sys.apple2 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
KryoFlux or alternatives for *writing* 18-sector disks on real hardware? "Michael 'AppleWin Debugger Dev'" <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 10:01 -0800
Re: KryoFlux or alternatives for *writing* 18-sector disks on real hardware? qkumba <peter.ferrie@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 20:51 -0800
Re: KryoFlux or alternatives for *writing* 18-sector disks on real hardware? "Michael 'AppleWin Debugger Dev'" <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 22:35 -0800
csiph-web