Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: Difficult question |
| Date | 2023-05-11 16:11 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <c1e6d72a-33a8-eefb-01ae-9017019fe73c@att.net> (permalink) |
| References | <861a1f8f-ed20-409c-872f-cc7f53616057n@googlegroups.com> <8b840345-59fb-4315-9272-652efd5b4515n@googlegroups.com> <596e4531-0647-4d54-ba51-a6dc806b5846n@googlegroups.com> <28c6a19c-ee24-4bf2-97ad-fd3f2016f67an@googlegroups.com> <857527e5-d1db-4f1d-8829-4fc99525fda0n@googlegroups.com> |
On 5/11/2023 7:40 AM, WM wrote: > Gus Gassmann schrieb am Donnerstag, > 11. Mai 2023 um 00:20:49 UTC+2: >> And once you have collected > infinitely many different such sets > > There are not enough to collect. > >> to remove > (no matter which ones they are), > their intersection is empty. > > Up to every infinite endsegment, Up to an end segment is not all end segments. 1×1 1-ended is not reallyreallyreallyreallyreallyreally large 1×1 2-ended. > Up to every infinite endsegment, > i.e., an endsegment that misses only > finitely many natnumbers, > the sequence of losses is finite. Each one of a 1x1 1-ended is last-before of the 1x1 2-ended part of a split. Each one is not in the other part of the split it is last-before, the 1x1 1-ended part (end segment) Each one is not in that 1-ended part, Each one is not in _all_ 1x1 1-ended parts of splits (end segments) Each one is not in the intersection of all 1x1 1-ended parts of splits, the intersection of all end segments. The intersection of all end segments of a 1x1 1-ended is empty.
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 10:08 -0700
Re: Difficult question Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 10:49 -0700
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 06:02 -0700
Re: Difficult question Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 15:20 -0700
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 04:40 -0700
Re: Difficult question Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-05-11 16:11 -0400
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 13:30 -0700
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 05:37 -0700
Re: Difficult question Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2023-05-12 14:18 -0400
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-13 06:14 -0700
Re: Difficult question Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 08:46 -0700
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 13:47 -0700
Re: Difficult question Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 14:01 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 14:28 -0700
Re: Difficult question Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 01:34 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 08:53 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 08:41 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 10:33 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 10:38 -0700
Re: Difficult question Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-14 11:48 -0700
Re: Difficult question WM <askasker48@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 05:38 -0700
csiph-web