Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64539
| From | Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: No overflow in variables? |
| Date | 2014-01-23 11:22 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <bkaukoFb7f6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dd6a72bf-b1c4-4868-9cfe-76dfac8b8787@googlegroups.com> <mailman.5846.1390415644.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico wrote: > (Which > means, no, Python cannot represent Graham's Number in an int. Sorry > about that.) This is probably a good thing. I'm told that any computer with enough RAM to hold Graham's number would, from entropy considerations alone, have enough mass to become a black hole. -- Greg
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:09 -0800
Re: No overflow in variables? Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-01-22 11:18 -0700
Re:No overflow in variables? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-22 13:26 -0500
Re: No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:32 -0800
Re: No overflow in variables? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-23 05:26 +1100
Re: No overflow in variables? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-22 15:55 -0500
Re: No overflow in variables? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-01-23 11:22 +1300
Re: No overflow in variables? Philip Red <filippo.biolcati@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-22 10:48 -0800
Re: No overflow in variables? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-01-22 18:13 -0500
Re: No overflow in variables? Christian Heimes <christian@python.org> - 2014-01-23 10:14 +0100
Re: No overflow in variables? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-23 20:36 +1100
csiph-web