Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > rec.food.cooking > #1449796
| From | dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.food.cooking |
| Subject | Re: sriracha by lee kum kee |
| Date | 2024-06-07 19:06 +0000 |
| Organization | Rocksolid Light |
| Message-ID | <af3d510910175e52aa59c3b5da1029ed@www.novabbs.org> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <v3lku5$3j88$1@dont-email.me> <rZmdnTMXwaFmysL7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <10795b50-33b1-0e57-e800-23d3c4242801@example.net> <Hq2dnUn4j6J8D_37nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <89589c66-6928-71e9-a9d4-a0768369b652@example.net> |
D wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2024, cshenk wrote: >> D wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024, cshenk wrote: >>> >>>> jmcquown wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/3/2024 7:04 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-06-03 6:46 p.m., jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/3/2024 6:04 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2024-06-03 5:34 p.m., jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2024 2:14 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is a white sauce and should have a lot of black >>>>>>>>>> pepper in it, keeping it from being bland. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SOS is a silly acronym that dates back more than half a >>>>>>>>> century. I'm given to understand it's because creamed >>>>>>>>> chipped beef does not look very appealing. I have never >>>>>>>>> had SOS with a lot of black pepper on or in it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, it is a silly acronym for a silly nickname. That's what >>>>>>>> you can expect when you are feeding a bunch of young men a >>>>>>>> long way from home and looking for little bits of joy in >>>>>>>> their lives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I could be mistaken but I think the SOS acronym came from the >>>>>>> fact that it was served very frequently all the time. Even >>>>>>> if they liked it the troops called it SOS meaning "same old >>>>>>> shit". >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Same old shit??? I always thought it was shit on a shingle. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Yeah, shit on a shingle, day after day. >>>>> >>>>> Jill >>>> >>>> Naw, a couple of times a week, it's an option with breakfast. Don't >>>> like it? Pick something else. There will be plenty of options. >>>> >>>> Think of the thread on 'gravy swamps' and some people grew up with >>>> that, and want a gravy option with every meal. >>>> >>>> I suspect you are thinking just a set meal and no or minimal >>>> options? Nope. Generally 3 mains (pick one), breakfast will have >>>> 2 or 3 side meats (pork sausage, bacon, beef sausage links are >>>> typical), 3 choices of bread, 3 or 4 fruit options, 1 or 2 sides >>>> like oatmeal, cream of wheat, boxed cereals are typical. >>>> >>>> Dinner and lunch will also have a lot of options from mains to >>>> sides to desserts and soups plus big fruit and salad bar. >>>> >>>> Once you get to Carrier size, It's a bit like a cruise liner with 7 >>>> galleys. Carriers very a bit on them but ususually the forward one >>>> is a sort of fast food affair (sliders, hot dogs, pizza, nachos, >>>> fries, small salad bar, chili are typical). Chief's mess (we kick >>>> in extra money so have better selections, best food on the ship). >>>> Flag staff officers mess, main galley, one thats 'weird' as its >>>> normally used by just flight deck crew and pilots, Wardroom mess >>>> with worst food on the ship but pretty china. >>>> >>>> There's a reason for it's food being worst. See, enlisted in their >>>> contract get fed for no charge. This is done by the ship taking >>>> your 254$ (probably more now) and buying the supplies for the >>>> enlisted galleys with it. (of shore duty you get that money unless >>>> you live on base and opt for free base galley). Officers don't get >>>> that and instead vote how much to pay. Officers are cheap. Hence >>>> crappy (but well prepared) food on pretty china. >>>> >>>> Smaller ships don't have that many galleys but the overall system is >>>> the same. >>>> >>>> Grin, probably more than you wanted to know but others might find it >>>> interesting. >>>> >>> >>> Jesus! That's like a luxury resort! Do they have art auctions, >>> magicians and a place for the children as well? ;) >> >> LOL, no, but sometimes we do a family day cruise combined with tours. >> I think kids had to be age 10 minimum. Dress rules like no heels >> higher than 1 inch and had to be flat, comfortable walking shoes, no >> skirts or dresses. Basically dress for a hike and expect a lot of very >> steep ladders. Remocal of all rings to a sturdy chain around your neck, >> recommended. >> > Hmm, I remember once I visited an old US submarine and it was very > claustrophobic. Didn't feel luxurious at all! Hmm... I wonder if it was > Baltimore perhaps? It was several decades ago, so can't remember at the > moment. The USS Bowfin is docked in Pearl Harbor. It was one of the most highly decorated submarines of the war. I was a little surprised at the construction. It's basically a metal tube with a facade of a deck so the crew would be able to walk on it. The deck had slats that you could see through. As I recall, they were made out of wood. It was like a roof purpose built to leak. The battle flag of the USS Bowfin is a hoot. There's a bus on it - they torpedoed a bus, as well as a crane, and a dock. This was an unparalleled feat of the war. https://www.facebook.com/PacificFleetSubmarineMuseum/photos/a.281621264838/10154119388729839 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro7HL-2Oln4
Back to rec.food.cooking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-06-02 22:14 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-03 10:56 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-03 18:14 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-03 22:39 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 17:16 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 13:37 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-05 16:10 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 10:24 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 22:23 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-03 17:34 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-03 18:04 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-03 18:46 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-04 08:51 +1000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-03 19:04 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-03 17:43 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-03 19:51 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-03 17:53 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-03 21:23 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-04 09:41 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 19:06 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 18:07 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Donald Shenkenberger <donald.shenkenberger@gmail.net> - 2024-06-04 14:12 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:10 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-04 17:06 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-05 07:17 +1000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:18 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-04 18:54 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-04 20:18 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-05 10:21 +1000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:19 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-05 12:40 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2024-06-05 16:45 -0500
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 15:48 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2024-06-05 17:02 -0500
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 16:06 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2024-06-05 17:40 -0500
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 16:46 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee gregorymorrow@msn.com (GM) - 2024-06-06 00:11 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-05 17:58 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 13:57 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-05 16:31 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 22:25 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-06 17:42 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-07 16:10 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-07 16:15 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee dsi100@yahoo.com (dsi1) - 2024-06-07 19:06 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-07 16:10 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-08 12:20 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-08 08:25 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-08 19:12 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-08 11:43 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-09 11:53 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-09 10:21 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-09 11:56 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-10 11:30 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-10 10:26 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-08 13:47 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-08 11:55 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Manasseh's Realm <mf@or.invalid> - 2024-06-08 11:56 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-05 12:32 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Graham <g.stereo@shaw.ca> - 2024-06-05 11:55 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 11:58 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-05 14:34 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-06 05:28 +1000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 13:37 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-06 17:55 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee user <user@example.net> - 2024-06-06 12:01 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 22:28 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 14:39 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-06 12:12 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Dave Smith <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> - 2024-06-06 13:37 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:10 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2024-06-04 07:29 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 19:17 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:15 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 17:50 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 10:22 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 22:24 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 14:30 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-05 16:36 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-05 22:26 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 17:19 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> - 2024-06-05 05:06 +1000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-05 09:12 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-03 17:41 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-06-04 11:53 +0200
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-03 17:26 -0600
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-03 18:12 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-03 17:26 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee "cshenk" <cshenk@virginia-beach.net> - 2024-06-04 19:19 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee jmcquown <j_mcquown@comcast.net> - 2024-06-03 17:38 -0400
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> - 2024-06-04 16:05 +0000
Re: sriracha by lee kum kee Jordan River <jor@is.invalid> - 2024-06-04 10:36 -0600
csiph-web