Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #1270
| From | Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot |
| Subject | Re: Correlation coefficient |
| Date | 2012-07-14 18:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a6dl3uFfr5U1@mid.dfncis.de> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <5f9b9ef2-4e51-4c6d-8951-83feb1b5e774@c20g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> <95mjm9F19cU1@mid.dfncis.de> <0fb8d538-97d6-455c-9f86-f8ecaf7a4583@b1g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <95q4sdF9m0U1@mid.dfncis.de> <9012ddb5-61bd-43cd-a54b-364afbbbf9d8@googlegroups.com> |
On 14.07.2012 17:37, alexis.paz@gmail.com wrote: > El martes, 14 de junio de 2011 19:16:20 UTC-3, Hans-Bernhard Bröker > escribió: >> The real issue is whether that r_xy is all that useful as you seem >> to think it is. Maybe you'ld be be better just not computing >> it at all? You're aware that you're replying to a post that's over one year old, right? > I think the problem is how compare the "goodness of fit" between two > curves. The chisqure from the gnuplot depends on the magnitude on the > axis. Only if you neglect to specify properly scaled error bars --- if you're going to be that negligent, you shouldn't be expecting serious results from _any_ mathematical tool.
Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Correlation coefficient alexis.paz@gmail.com - 2012-07-14 08:37 -0700 Re: Correlation coefficient Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-07-14 18:29 +0200
csiph-web