Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1900
| From | Frank Swarbrick <fswarbrick@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: the registry |
| Date | 2012-07-05 21:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a5n55tFv8dU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <c1091547-e93d-4e63-83ff-7c2160d1abd7@googlegroups.com> <registry-20120705164846@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <jt4dm6$7e2$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 7/5/12 9:58 AM, BGB wrote: > in my run through college, about the closest the classes ever got to > talking about hierarchical databases was to briefly condemn older > database systems, and then extoll the virtues of the relational database > model as the "one true solution to everything". > > meanwhile, I personally use a hierarchical database system in my projects. What database is that? We use the mainframe hierarchical database IMS at my shop, and I've always wondered why there don't seem to be any others. Or more likely, why I can't locate them.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
the registry bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-07-05 07:15 -0700
Re: the registry Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 16:21 +0100
Re: the registry BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:58 -0500
Re: the registry Frank Swarbrick <fswarbrick@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 21:42 -0600
Re: the registry BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-05 23:35 -0500
csiph-web